I’ll happily answer those questions when you answer mine first.
Since you insist that Israeli civilians living on the West Bank are “looters” who are legitimate targets of violence do you also feel that Chinese settlers in occupied Tibet and Russian settlers in occupied Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania during the days of the Soviet Union were legitimate targets of violence?
Furthermore, since American and Canadian whites are also “looters” does that mean that they’re legitimate targets as well?
This is moderately entertaining. On what principle, pray tell, ought I answer your questions first?
Er, because you decided to put up a post where you said the killing of Israeli children was wrong, but the killing of Israeli adult civilians on the West Bank was kosher and that they deserved what they got.
By such logic the White Canadians and White Americans are, to use your term, “looters” and by your logic Chinese settlers in Tibet and Russian settlers in the Baltic Republics during the time of the Soviet Union were legitimate targets.
I simply asked perfectly logical questions based on your statements. You asked me questions which had no logical basis in anything I said. I never said anything about “Israelis wanting peace” or commented on the integrity and trustworthiness of American Jews.
So, once again, since you insist that Israeli civilians living on the West Bank are “looters” who are legitimate targets of violence do you also feel that Chinese settlers in occupied Tibet and Russian settlers in occupied Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania during the days of the Soviet Union were legitimate targets of violence?
Furthermore, since American and Canadian whites are also “looters” does that mean that they’re legitimate targets as well.
Yes.
Instead of selecting bits of history that will tend to favor one side or the other, I’ll just say that it’s not about money.