Could You Believe?

Gaudere assumed some months ago that as a Christian I believed in the sacrificial savior thingie. I (somewhat more vehemently than necessary) corrected that. A god who would demand human sacrifice, even one willingly given, even one who was “God on his father’s side,” as the price of his forgiveness is yet another facet of our old friend the Divine Weasel.

Do I believe in the Atonement? Yes. Why? Because us humans have some peculiar traits, and one of them is that a poignant death tends to get through to us when nothing else will. Cases in point: What do the following titles mean to you? “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomed” – “Sergeant York” – even “Abraham, Martin, and John” for a touch of bathos. Like prayer, God doesn’t call for it for His psychology, but for ours.

As previously noted, if there is any such thing as a conscious, effectively omniscient and omnipotent, benevolent Divine Being, he would need to be incomprehensible in the literal meaning of the word – our minds are too small to encompass him. So we each grasp the aspects of him that fit our own abilities. A believing Glitch would see the strengthener who teaches spiritual katas and enables one to be strong in his cause. A believing Gaudere would see a god who gives joy and delights in the ironies of his creation. A believing Polycarp would see a compassionate peacemaker who brings hurt and divided people to healing, wholeness, and unity. And so on.

Some interesting thought processes Glitch.

You apparently still have some problems with resolving how God can be real based on your circumstances.

Let me try a different approach. Hopefully this will not fall apart and will get the points across that I wish to convey.

Glitch I do not know much about your family life or how you interact with your children. But I will assume that it is much like the rest of the people I know including myself, so I am going to share about my family and go from there.

Glitch I have a mother and a father and a younger sister. Now, I have traits that are similar to each of these people and many traits that are very different.

My parents (far from perfect mind you) have a lot of past experiences that they have relied on to deal with me as a child. They tried to tell me how to do certain things, but others they let me try and fail (as long as it would not be fatal). They let me work on my homework until I asked for help and then only provided what was needed at the moment. They realized that giving me too much help would make me dependant on them and I would never be prepared for the world outside.

They treated my sister similar to me (that is they did not favor one over the other) but they did deal with us differently. We react differently to requests, to commands, to encouragement. They did what they needed to in dealing with me and then other methods to deal with my sister.

Why was this necessary?

  1. Because my sister and I are different people we needed different things from our parents.

  2. To prepare me for life. This includes school, work, my own family.

  3. To prepare me to be a father. To realize later that they did what they did out of love. And to learn to not kill your child just because they screw up.

Now, if my parents, who have limited experience (short life span and only two children), know enough to rely on their past and are able to teach me to be a better person and a better father through the trials and experiences with them, then how much more would a loving God be able to do so.

God has seen a whole bunch while we humans have been around. He knows what works on us and what does not. Sometimes we do not listen to those around us. My father could tell me constantly not to touch the heater, but the first time I touched it when it was on was the last time I touched it. The first time I stuck a screwdriver in the electric outlet was the last time I did it. Why? Because I learned from my mistakes. Had I listened to my parents I would not have even had to make those mistakes, but since I did not, I learned the hard way.

Sometimes we do not listen to God and we have to learn the hard way.

Jeffery

Respectfully Poly, I don’t see how you can call yourself a Christian? A theist, yes. Christian, I don’t see how.

Similarly, if I ignore Jesus then TDM becomes eminently possible, and many events would even suggest that TDM exists (although this would indicate a pure TDM which is irrelevent). So, that being the case I am a theist too, since I reject TDM by accepting TDM. (Note to self, uhhh… maybe you better continue using the term atheist).

Possibly true enough but this is not the common description of God. This is Any God or as I called it above a multi-faceted God (multiple natures). I could accept the multi-faceted God hypothesis if and only if God dealt with people primarily on an individual basis. I.e., as above, for those that need love and guidance He does so, for those who need to be left alone He does so, but this is not what the evidence suggests is the case. Jesus torpedoes that quite nicely. Jesus was a club from the “You are all sinners and must accept my sacrifice for salvation” facet. It is not an individual call, but a call to humanity. It is directly opposed to the notion of a multi-faceted God that deals with each of us individually. Or, as above, it indicated a God in conflict with itself.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Jeffery, please correct me if I am wrong, but it sounds like you are saying alot of the same things Polycarp has said, just in a different manner. I think my reply above covers what you are saying as well.

A God who deals with us differently and seperately is not the god that appears to exist.

Well, if Jesus is buggin’ you, why not be a Jew? The Christian God isn’t the only one out there, ya know, even if He is the one we seem to hear the most about. The Jewish God has done his share of big “hey, look at me, I’m God, everybody worship me and do these things or else” events, though, too. The Jewish God may not require all people to do what His chosen people do, but He does want everybody to believe in God as part of the Noachide laws, so that’s not exactly “leaving some people alone”, either.

Glitch said:

How is Romans 10:9

That is to say, if Poly acknowledges Christ and accepts him as Lord (and all that that entails, e.g., obedience, etc.), and acknowledges God has raised him from the dead (which I believe Poly has said before he believes in some sense), then he is a Christian.

From 30 AD (+ or - 5) til now, the true significance of Christ’s death and resurrection (i.e., how it saves us), has been debated. The Lutheran Church and the RCC have just recently agreed to allow that their views are not necessarily incompatible (IIRC, they haven’t agreed on why, yet).

ANYWAY, (IMHO) Poly may debate the significance of the cross and what it actually means and still call himself a Christian (not that he needs my affirmation!).

Tinker

1 John 4:2-3

and 1 John 4:9-10

and 1 John: 14

It is insufficient to simply believe that God raised Jesus from the dead. You must also accept that as a sacrifice for our sin.

I feel humbled, and at the same time proven right (as regards the adjective thread). I have now been witnessed to by an atheist! :smiley:

Yes, I get precisely the point you are making, Glitch. My understanding is that, just as God doesn’t need to know that you need a raise, or your heart comforted, or whatever you are praying about, but you need to be in communication with Him about it, so likewise it was not for some hypertrophied sense of universal karma on God’s part that Jesus died, but that men who don’t listen otherwise might believe in him. He didn’t “buy off God by sacrificing himself” – he was God making the supreme sacrifice (pace Sake Samurai, who doesn’t see it as a sacrifice at all) to try to get through to us hard-headed Teeming Millions who are more interested in whether Bob Eubanks had a contestant who did or didn’t say something outre than in what God sees as best for our eternal lives.

Glitch:

Those are great verses. Thanks.

To accept Jesus as Lord (Romans 10:9) (and all that that entails - to quote myself), requires accepting what those verses entail. It is rather difficult to follow/obey/emulate someone who says “I and my father are one,” if you don’t think He is God.

My point, more or less, is that a person’s belief as to how Jesus’ sacrifice imparts salvation isn’t as important as that he believes that it does impart salvation.

Tinker

Tinker, I agree that the how is less important theologically speaking than the does; however, note that Polycarp says:

That suggests to me that Polycarp (Manyfish … that one still cracks me up) doesn’t accept the human/God sacrifice as being necessary towards salvation. This is in contradiction with typical Christian philosophy, as evidenced by the Bible and even in contradiction with what you posted, i.e. I believe that Poly’s statment suggests that Christ’s sacrifice does not necessarily bring salvation exclusively regardless of the "how"s of when it does (if it does/can at all in his view). Either that or I am wrong … wouldn’t be the first time. :wink:

My sincere apologies, good Sir. It was not my intent to witness to you. I feel dreadfully shamed by my attempts to conv…er…t … hey, wait a minute. :slight_smile:

This makes sense from a certain perspective. However, if we accept a multi-faceted God, one facet of which feels obliged to make His presence known in a grand way, and other facets which do not, what does that mean to you? How could TDM facet accept such a trump card being played? How could any facet which believes in personal interaction accept such a grandoise display (amongst other displays)? To ruthlessly meddle in the stuggle of the human spirit would be a GREAT wrong in the parts of the eyes of the multi-faceted God.

Take the flood. The TDM facet would never do or allow such a thing! If everybody had turned away and towards evil, so be it. That is true free will. If heaven and hell are states of spirit then the danger is to the person’s own spirit and they have to grow out of their own evil and death on their own. To tap unlimited power and unlimited sight to change humanities view (even by killing them all) is plain wrong, from the TDM’s perspective.

Any of the grand (non-luck based) miracles would be absolutely wrong from TDMs perspective, or any facet which believes in limited intervention or personal relationships only.

A multi-faceted God is a God in conflict. A God in conflict makes less sense than the Divine Weasel!

I guess it is possible that there could be a multi-faceted God in which several of the facets share certain critical elements. Like, the all accept the occasional non-luck based miracle being seen by one or more people. This allows a multi-faceted God in harmony; however, it cannot include TDM.

OK. We’re on the same page with that one. God’s mercy be on Poly ;). I am anxious to read his response.

Thanks for the Manyfish. I guess I did lurk long enough to see that one before. :slight_smile:

Okay so you did not rip my parents interaction to shreads and maybe it conveyed the beginnings of a common ground to see how God could fit in your ideas.

First I am not saying that God is a different God for each person. Or that each person has a facet of God all to themselves.

I believe my parents love me. Some of the ways they showed me love was the same as they way they showed my sister (hugged us, feed us, read to us, clothed us, etc.) This is because we have inate traits that are common among all humanity (at least common among most) Yet, due to our differences there were ways they communicated their love differently to the both of us. Now, one of us may have seen this different conveiance (sp) as they loved the other one more, but in reality what says love to me is different than what says love to my sister.

In the same way, God shows himself to everyone (or most people) in some areas due to the inner traits of man that are the same (the need to feel love and give love, the need to have certain needs met, etc.). Yet other areas he deals with us differently. If I need to get a spiritual smack in the head to help me to realize that which is in front of me, then he does so. If I seek him, he will show himself to me. But if I do not know him, then I may not recognize him when he does show himself.

It may be a bit on the cliche side, but I think it is an analogy that works. Your heart is like a door without a doorknob on the outside. Christ cannot (will not) open the door, you have to open it and invite him in.

Did Christ have to die to save us from our sins? Nope. How do I know? Because the bible tells me so. The bible says that God took Enoch to heaven in a chariot of fire, because Enoch was a righteous man. I believe that all the righteous people before Christ came and died are in heaven now. Why did Christ die? He died to be the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. Why was this necessary?

God told Adam and Eve that the punishment for eating the forbidden fruit was death. When they ate it they did not die. But the wages of sin is death. For our sins we deserve to die. And we deserve to live in separtion from God. Jesus (a facet of God if you will) chose to come to earth as a man and chose to die to pay that price. Yes, our bodies still die, but our souls live on in heaven forever.

Why did God have to send his son to die? Because we thick headed humans would not have likely been as persuaded if God had sent a Holy Goat. We needed a sacrifice that was beyond our normal comprehension.

Glitch I tell you the truth I would give my life for my child or my wife. I would give my life to save yours. But I would not sacrifice my daughter to save anyone. So the fact that God watched his son suffer the pain that he did is what makes it the ultimate sacrifice.

Jeffery

But…but…I thought Jesus was God. So didn’t God sacrifice himself? Ow. Theism makes my brain hurt. :wink:

If you could believe in a marshmallow god, than why can’t you believe in NO god ? :confused:

Vinny: I pretty much retract my entire OP. It just didn’t come out right. And I can’t quite say it so that it sounds perfect.

Poly, and Jeffery: I am not ignoring your request. It just takes time to answer such deep questions, especially since I need some Scripture to back it up. One of these days, I’ll have enough free time to answer you both.

Glitch: It’s good to see that you are still thinking about God, in some capacity.

Adam


“Life is hard…but God is good”

Adam, if you say so. :wink: I am not “thinking” about god, in the sense I am not actively trying to reconcile my thoughts with that of any possible god. I.e. I am not, at this time, trying to find god. Actually, I am in the middle of a rather life changing decision. I am considering handing over my dojo to my senior instructor, closing down my game making business, and changing careers (law enforcement). I don’t have time for god right now but that never keeps me from enjoying a good intelligent discussion. I mention this only so that I am not deceiving anybody with regards to my intentions.

Glitch, Then it is a good thing that God has all the time in the world, huh? :wink:

Gaudere, I know the atheists are going to love this, but when it comes to God, leave your mind out of it and go with your heart. That is not to say quit thinking, but without a lot of study, prayer, and faith some of the things like the trinity do not even begin to make sense.
Jeffery

Glitch, Then it is a good thing that God has all the time in the world, huh? :wink:

Gaudere, I know the atheists are going to love this, but when it comes to God, leave your mind out of it and go with your heart. That is not to say quit thinking, but without a lot of study, prayer, and faith some of the things like the trinity do not even begin to make sense.
Jeffery

I wish you the best of luck in your career change, Glitch. My thought is, when God wants you, he’ll be in touch. All you need to do is not ignore his knocking on your door. (“Have you found God?” “I didn’t know he was lost.”)

To answer the questions asked me or implied by folks in the course of this thread:

I believe in God. Period. I put my full faith and trust in his goodness, grace, mercy, and lovingkindness. Who is this God? Apparently the Christian God.

It’s important to distinguish dogma from terminology in talking about him. Any discussion of the Trinity would have Gaudere poking holes in it you could sail the Titanic through. It’s an abstruse, near-paradoxical concept. I believe in the Holy Trinity. But it doesn’t necessarily have to be understood in the Aristotelian formulations that the church has traditionally used.

Start with one god. I and all Christians are as firm on this as the most Orthodox of Jews or the most fervent of Muslims. He reveals himself in three personae – and let’s use the Latin, not the English. A persona is the mask an actor in classical Greek theatre wears, and by extension the character he portrays. That actor may have several roles in the course of the play. God certainly does.

He reveals himself as creator and as tutelary deity of the Hebrews/Jews. He reveals himself as the Holy Spirit playing one-on-one with our own spirits. And he reveals himself in a historically unique way through the character of Jesus of Nazareth, itinerant rabbi.

One god. Three personae. BTW, the Trinity was never defined as three and no more…three is the number of personae he’s used in relating with humans. As with spatial dimensions, there may be others we have no knowledge of; three is what we have to work with.

As I’ve tried to explain by analogy with prayer, God rarely if ever expects anything of humans because he wants or needs it. He normally does it because it’s needful or important to our spiritual development. He does not need me praying for Edlyn and her kid – he’s perfectly well aware of what they need. But it’s important for me to be aware that they need my prayers – that they are fellow suffering humans. Same goes for peace in ____ (fill in the trouble spot of your choice). He’s got it under control, and is working out his plan there. It’s me who needs to be aware of its need for peace.

Likewise with the Atonement. Whatever Paul and John may have meant by the language they use, God didn’t need to have a human sacrifice, or even a divine sacrifice, to credit against the debit of human sin in his cosmic balance book. He doesn’t keep those kinds of records. He cares about you individually, as a father cares about his child, not as a banker cares about his loan accounts. But Jesus gave his life to bring God and man back together when what Lib. calls religion politicians were structuring his idea for guidance in living a balanced, healthy life into a set of careful rules about what kind of what you could eat when and how much effort of what kind you could make on his day of rest, and all the rest of that convoluted garbage, and the vast majority of humans were either ignoring God altogether or taking one minor element of his nature and turning it into a minor deity, repeating the process until they had a pantheon and then mythologizing them.

Jesus died to save me. I have no doubt of that. But I don’t see it as paying off an upset God – rather, he did it because I was too damned dense to pay attention until he did something that poignant and dramatic. And the same is true for all of us.

That is how I see it. YTMV.

Well, the persona argument kinda shoots down Jeffery’s comment about how hard it was for God to let His son die. Letting one’s child-persona suffer is not the same as letting your child suffer.

The explanation I prefer for the trinity thing is that it’s not supposed to make sense. God does not have personas, you do not have to understand it with your heart to “get it”, or anything like that. Thinking of God as one and three at the same time is like thinking of a married bachelor. It doesn’t make any sense, and this demonstrates how far above our minds God is. So meditating on the oneness and threeness of God will help you realize how incomprehsible to us He is. The three-in-one thing is probably a holdover from Christianity’s mystic days, IMHO; the Jews never had anything so odd. Does anyone besides me think the Holy Ghost seems like a total add-on just stuck in there so they could have the magic number 3? I mean, he never really does all that much; it’s all God, God, God, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, God, Jesus, God, Jesus, oh yeah, by the way there’s this Holy Ghost birdie too.