Covington Catholic High (in case it hasn't been mentioned already)

Hahahaha. The “boy” was standing on the steps. The teenager didn’t move, or change his position. The teenager didn’t even talk. The old man walked up to the teenager, and tried to bully him with his incessant drumming, and with his caterwauling. The old man leaned left and right and continued drumming and wailing. The teenager didn’t move, or speak. The teenager didn’t do anything wrong. The teenager didn’t do anything illegal. If the annoying old man wanted the teenager to move out of his path, he had the option of politely asking the teenager to move. The old man wanted a confrontation and he didn’t get one.

Some people may hate this teenager because of the clothes he wore. Some people may hate this teenager because he’s white. Some people may hate this teenager because he’s Christian. Some people may hate this teenager simply because they are bored haters who needed a new cause celebre after Mueller denied the Buzzfeed fake news. Regardless, this teenager didn’t do anything wrong, and he was being bullied by the old man.

Seriously? The teenager is simply standing still. The old man chose to walk up to the teenager, and you expect the teenager to move out of the way? Why? Because you do not approve of the teenager’s clothing? Or because the teenager is white? Or because you don’t like the teenagers face?

Damn straight!

Virtue signaling is also some Christians (there were some in my family) who would make sure you knew they were more Christian than others, even if they did not always act like good Christians should themselves.

Bullying and harassing is bad, it’s bad about the kids this thread is about and it’s bad against that woman and against anyone else.
As I said, this is a matter of principles and I have expressed this principle in many places over many events. You are now playing the game of whattaboutism,.
But if you insist, can you point to me to a similar thread created here at the SDMB with the purpose of attacking Ford, where people engage in Internet mob behaviour, condone and incite bullying and harassment? Because I don’t recall seen one, but if there is I’d be happy to go there and tell anyone who is doing what you are doing here against those kids to knock it off.

You, and others, are the ones condoning, defending and participating in online bullying and harassment, right here, right now.
There’s an analogy I read once that is quite apt “the snowflake doesn’t blame itself for the avalanche”.
The only thing you have done to justify being part of a hate mob falling on a group of kids is it is to point a finger at others and assume that they have done the same or worse so it’s OK to do it, that those kids have it coming for belonging to a different tribe, playing the game of guilt by association and so on and so forth.
It’s such a stupid and morally bankrupt thing to do, well those evil people do this thing too (and that’s why we think they are evil) so why are you telling me not to, huh? Gotcha!. It’s that it? You are just painting yourself as being no better than the people you hate, well done.

What that tells is that you know what you are doing is wrong and you do it anyway because you feel justified from an Us Vs. Them perspective, where Us = Good and Them = Bad, so anything Us do is good and anyone who says otherwise is Them and therefore bad. What a wonderful moral license, to feel that the only reason someone would tell you to stop doing something is that they are bad people trying to stop you from doing good things.

You need to let it sink in: right now, right here, you are part of an Internet mob.

I’m talking about the people who make a big show of condemning the kneeling football players, but who don’t seem to care about any of the real forms of disrespect that happen during the NA. The Mike Pence 49ers Flounce is a perfect example of “virtue signaling” to me.

I don’t know who invented “special snowflake”, but I think it’s an apt description for lots of people–including conservatives. So I’ma keep using that one too, thankyouverymuch.

I can picture it, a red box on the wall, a pitchfork and a torch inside with the words “In case of Doubt Break Glass” written on it.

much simpler than that - because the teenager is standing in someone else’s way, someone else that is trying to get to a point beyond where this teenager is standing. Other teenagers in attendance were able to step aside and let this person move thru the crowd - its called ‘courtesy’ - look it up.

So the facial expression that would have been more appropriate for that situation would be “don’t be in that situation”?

What is courteous about walking up to someone and pounding a drum mere inches from their face? The old man was looking for a confrontation, and he attempted to bully the students until he got one. The teenager wouldn’t be bullied. The teenager stood his ground. You can try to justify the old man’s bullying tactic any way you chose.

Here’s a reason.com article that includes a long statement from Nick Sandmann, “the kid with the smirk”.

IMO, he’s either being sincere here or has extraordinary talent at dissimulation.

you are truly a special kind of delusional - enjoy yourself.

As it turns out, the teenagers stood away eventually, see the NYT report. As pointed before, there is a lesson here about standing up for what is right, but too bad that it does not fit your prejudice.

:rolleyes: This from the guy who defended alt-right harassing troll and Gamergater-baiter Milo Yiannopoulos by claiming that “the hatred he receives from the Left is in large part due to him being a threat to the Left brand image”.

Your “principle” that “bullying and harassing is bad” doesn’t seem to have troubled you much when it was Yiannopoulos who was bullying and harassing people. You simply downplayed his behavior as just being a “professional troll” who’s (allegedly) undeservedly hated because he’s (allegedly) “drawing people away from the progressive left”.

Given your track record, I’m not exactly impressed with your newfound “principle” of (alleged) opposition to bullying and harassment.

Surprise, surprise: the diocese that Covington Catholic is in doesn’t like teh gay, either.

Are you one of those people who pre-judged the teenager based on claims, innuendo, rumors, and feelings? Or are one of those people who demand that people get out of your way based on how loud you bang your unconvincing drum?

No 16-year-old wrote that.

Of notice is that indeed, he does not mention the MAGA hats. As for the article, there is no mention about the very recent insults tossed by the MAGAT in chief that landed not only on Elizabeth Warren but on all Native Americans. One should mention that I also do not agree with the Black Israelis, although that it does seem that the Reason Magazine writer is an ignorant of the accusations that have been launched against Trump and the support by him to people like Roy Moore. Point being that while I do not agree with BI, ignoring why a peculiar insult was used by them sounds a bit naive when a “role model” of the teens supported very reprehensible people in an attempt at getting positions of power or to possibly get them off the hook.

Since I pointed at a report that looked at the big picture, it is clear that you only showed all how a willful ignorant of context and what was posted before you are.

I was thinking the same thing about you. Except for the “enjoy yourself” part, of course. You can chose to advocate for bullying teenagers if you chose. That’s your choice. Convincing others to buy into your delusion is something else.