I love the YouTube channel Crash Course. Except for one series, which naturally is the one I’m going to talk about.
There’s a series on Games. It consists of twenty-nine separate episodes. Here is the breakdown for what topics are covered on these episodes:
- An introduction to the course
- A history of the origins of games in ancient times
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Card games
- Board games
- Educational games - mostly video games
- Psychology of games - with an emphasis of video games
- Sports
- Role-playing games
- Designing games - with an emphasis on video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Video games
- Game shows
- Live action role-playing games
- Gambling
- Pokemon
- The future of games - surprise twist ending; it will involve video games
I have to say I did not find this to be a completely balanced treatment of the subject. I feel there may have been just a little too much emphasis placed on one particular form of gaming. It’s like if I wrote a thirty chapter history of the world and devoted twenty chapters to the United States.
Seriously, I think I would have been happier if they had thrown out everything else and just made this a twenty episode series on Video Games.
Or am I showing my age? Maybe I’m just out of touch with the topic. Should a history of games focus the majority of its efforts on video games?