Creationism v. Evolution

Wow. I’ve just discovered this aspect of the Straight Dope site. I spent 30 minutes reading some of this discussion and my eyes hurt terribly, so my response must be short for now.

Science is frequently wrong in it’s conclusions about the world around us. But science does two things religion never does:
1: It constantly tries to update and correct any errant conclusions. Because each answer begets new questions, this is an ongoing process that deliniates science from religion. Religion goes out of its way to halt any new learning or discovery. Science has a long history of reversing previous absolutes, it’s called modeling. When the facts no longer explain the model, change the model to fit the facts. When’s the last time you heard any religious scholar try to reverse something in the Bible through new facts? (Yes, I know, you say the Bible is already correct and is all factual, stop reading this and go to Church). Religion teaches the new recruit (child) to accept what is told to him and refute nothing. Which brings me finally to my second point:
2: Science never says "beleive in me or you will be killed, tortured, excommunicated, chastised publicly (cold fusion notwithstanding), or spend eternity in a miserable and lousy place full of torture and hate, not unlike your high school experience.

Evolution is painfully obvious. Here’s a question for our devout readers: God ostensibly created only two people: Adam and Eve. I don’t care what race or physiacl attributes they had, but i’d say they did not possess white and brown black and yellow skin. I’m sure they didn’t have Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid eyes, having merely two eyes apiece (right)? I assume they weren’t at once tall, short, fat, thin, extomorphic, endomorphic, mesomorphic, blond,
brunette, redheadhed, straight haired, kinky haired…you all get the point.
Clearly, by the Bible’s own reckoning, humans can evolve.

As did everything else.

God, my eyes hurt.

umm what is one day?
While it is true yowm is the Hebrew
word for day in Genesis we also need to look at it in a whole before we will understand it
Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. > And the evening and the morning were the first day.<
This is taken from the KJV (most other versons say the same) the bible says one day is one period of light and night
Just a thought here


To know Christ and to make Him known to others.

Hike: as you just showed, the Bible also calls one period of light without a period of darkness one day. Which is it? The light or the light with the dark?

Just for fun: let’s all rush to an interpretation of the Quran and read Surah 2, verse 80.

Cheers!
-Chip

All I was pointing out is that the Bible shows that one day in creation was the same then as we know today.
Not to poke fun at any one, just because we call the time when a lot of people are up working day and that is when most of them see the sun, it has nothing to do with the day as a whole in what it is called.
It was just a thought

Hey, this is the BBQ Pit, so allow me…
Hike4Fun’s sig:

In the Biblical sense? Isn’t that like “pimping” Christ?

I can’t believe “God” would need so much advertising.

Reported as zombie.

Moderator Note

Dalai, we prefer that you not bump ancient threads in most forums (exceptions being General Questions and a few others, and then only when you contribute new factual information). I see you did the same thing with another thread on creationism in Great Debates. If you have something to say, there are recent threads on creationism in Great Debates, or else you can start a new one. Please stop bumping old threads.

Colibri
Moderator