Creationist rhetoric

[monavis]

@InfraBlue

One could posit that God has always existed, has always been. One could take it further, eliminate the middle man–God, and posit that the world itself has always existed, has always been. The idea that the world is “the Creation” is merely assuming that the world was created. Fleshing out what cmyk wrote, taking this assumption as the premise for an argument is an example of begging the question. Saying that “the Creation proves a Creator” is merely circular logic based on begging the question.

It would still infer that God had to have a place in which to exist,so place was there before God. If someone or thing is nowhere it doesn’t exist. This is using a human mind, and that is all we have to go on.