Perhaps “What criteria would govern the evolution of animals in the future?”
Or perhaps “What potential animals might make the best gimmicks for TV commercials?” 
Won’t be so little 200 million years from now, though…
um… my last post was a reply to astro.
Maybe the SUV makers are missing a bet – take the chase scene from Jurassic Park and morph the video to put their vehicle in place of the Jeep – making sure to emphasize the part where it pulls away from the T-Rex!
Naw, have the T-Rex eat the SUV, and then look at the camera and say “What would Jesus drive?” while picking his teeth with the rear axle.
actually its pronounced (foe pah) and it means , “a false trail in latin”
yes theres a debate here, no one believes that these creatures will exist, i meant as in (chupacabra look-alikes) www.chupacabra.com
OK…I think this has mutated into an MPSIMS thread.
Well, I didn’t see that last post by fauxpas as I was moving this…if you want to start a new thread on the “Chupacabra” in particular or cryptozoology in general–the science, or “science” as some would prefer–of such creatures as the Loch Ness monster, Sasquatch (“Bigfoot”), Yeti (“Abominable Snowman”), that might be a little more focused, and result in a bit more of a debate.
Do tell! 
[Sheriff Little Bill voice] “Fox says I” [/Sheriff Little Bill voice]
Pas du tout, mon ami - c’est français pour “false step”.
Man, MEBuckner, you take all the fun out of things!
The only definition of “faux pas” that I know is French, and it means a mistake or error. It’s possible that it may be present in Latin too, but I’ve never heard of it being used in that fashion.
Bah, I swear Olentzero’s post wasn’t there when I hit reply - I guess that’s what happens when I take a phone call during a post. 
I’m the Alan Greenspan of Great Debates–it’s my job to take away the punch bowl just when the party gets going.
I suppose that’s a little clearer than the OP which I could make heads nor tails out of.
Okay, if no one believes they will exist then there is no debate because everyone agrees. If no one but you believes it then we have an actual debate. Do you believe “chupacabra look-alikes” will exist in the future? Why? Do you have any argument that supports your position?
And bring it back with a fresh, steamin’ turd in it.
What, exactly, does that website have to do with goat-suckers?
its about goat suckers…lol theyve been mutated…
Not futuristic but prehistoric and real!
Andalgalornis