Jim Thompson is not only my favorite crime/noir writer, but perhaps one of my favorite authors overall. I don’t think I’ve ever read any novel that has such a visceral, kick in the guts ending as The Grifters. I loaned it to Miss Moneypenny, whose isn’t a hardcore reader, and she read the thing in one sitting, and with the same response. 'Course, some of his work is utter crap, but at his best (The Grifters, Pop. 1280, After Dark, My Sweet) are outstanding.
Ditto for Patricia Highsmith. Although her Ripley novels are most well known, I think Cry Of The Owl is probably the best thing she wrote. Again, some of her work could be dismissed without loss (a fact to which she openly admitted while alive) but at her best, she was the best.
James M. Cain and Raymond Chandler are also good. I used to like Gregory MacDonald before he milked the Fletch series into the ground. I’m sorry he sold the rights to a studio who used it as a Chevy Chase project, but then again, so is he, apparently. I’ve never read Parker’s work, but people speak so highly of it I probably should.
I like James Ellroy’s short fiction but find his novels (or at least, the later ones) to be bloated, and his “shotgun” prose to be overly stylistic and unimaginative. He clearly does extenisve research, but often the historical facts and secondary characters seem to exist soley for the purpose of letting the reader know exactly how much research he did. I haven’t read White Jazz or L.A. Confidential, of which I’ve heard people describe as being his best work, so I’m not going to cut him off entirely, but he’s not number one on the list.
I never got the appeal of Vacchs. A lot of people like him, I guess; I find his work cliched and tedious. He claims to write in short bursts between court functions and whatnot, and I can believe it, as he seems to meander around from one subplot to another until coming to a completely irrelevent denouement. I give him master props for his work as a legal advocate for abused children, but I think is writing sucks. Sorry, Andy.
For the most part, it’s a genre I just don’t get into all that much. Crime/mystery for it’s own sake just isn’t that interesting, and a failure of much of the genre writing is that it is either about the crime and not the characters, or the characters are so…deliberately idiosyncratic, so unlike anyone you’d ever meet in real life, that it just comes off as a characture. Roy Dillon or Tom Ripley just seem like normal guys, albeit (in Ripley’s case) with a rather distorted, sociopathic view of the world.
Stranger