Dad called a perv for photographing his own kid

The ironic thing is that since a woman raised a stink about the kids’ pictures ending up on the Internet, the kids’ pictures ended up on the Internet. Way to fight crime, moron.

It’s sad that people just assume a man interacting with kids is a pervert but I was even more saddened by the responses to the article because they were very civil and well typed. If that had been an American website there would have been people blaming Obama, liberals and Sarah Palin. There also would have been a lot of typos and exclamation points and posts in all caps and several posts linking to celebrity sex tapes or nude pics.

You actually left?

That sucks!

Would “Look, lady, your kid’s really not that hot” be an appropriate response in that situation? (Being asked to leave a park because of a paranoid nut.)

Why at him of all posters? Merely because Der views all persons with the slightest opposition to a woman’s right to abortion on demand as sick, twisted, bigoted and evil doesn’t mean that he himself has an idealised view of the female sex.

It amused me to see him getting yelled at in the Pit the other day. Not for the yelling itself, but for the irony of seeing how people who would normally cheer him on against pro-lifers and believers of any stamp suddenly start howling to the high heavens when it’s their own ox being gored.

/hijack

In my daydreams I find myself punching the crazy lady too. To be accused of such a vile transgression without any evidence whatsoever is offensive in the extreme.

In the real world, however, it’s a no-win situation: if you bloody her nose, well, you may not have been a pedophile, but now you’re clearly you’re a misogynist with violent anti-social tendencies. :rolleyes:

“Now we see the violence inherent in the system…”

I’ve been a stay-at-home dad since my boy was born almost 6 years ago. I’ve lost count of the number of cautious, accusatory looks I’ve gotten while taking my boyo to the park, or to lunch at a burger joint, or to anywhere that’s considered ‘only for Moms’ during the daylight hours. I consider it a subtle form of gender bias.

The Average Jane sees a woman at the park with a child at 2:00 in the afternoon and thinks, “Oh, how sweet…she stays home with the kids.”

The same Average Jane sees a man at the park with a child at 2:00 in the afternoon and thinks, “Who is that that man? What is he doing with that poor child? Why isn’t he at work at this time of day? I’d better get my cellphone out and prepare to call 9-1-1…”

It doesn’t help that I dress…interestingly and have a lot of tattoos; that just makes her think, “What a weirdo. And look at all of those tattoos; he’s probably a dangerous ex-con.”

I’ve also heard that people tend to be kind of patronizing towards men watching their kids. Like, “Oh, you babysitting for the day?” Or I read a post by someone a long time ago saying that a flight attendant on a plane was very attentive to a single dad and his kids, saying what a great dad he was, while completely ignoring the single mom who was with her kids. I guess it’s from the same reasoning–a woman watching the kids is a default, whereas a man doing it is something new or quirky or bizarre. In some cases, I suppose it’s, “Aww, how sweet” and in others, it’s more, “What is he doing with kids? is he some kind of PRE-VERT?!”

It is just another in a long line of “moral panics”. There was an excellent study on the subject in general entitled Folk Devils and Moral Panics.

The conclusion appears to be that most “moral panics” eventually simply burn themselves out.

That looks interesting. I’ll have to see whether the public library has a copy… checking… they have it! Both the original and the second edition. Unfortunately, it’s at the Reference Library only and I would have to read it there. But it seems there’s a whole literature about this, including “Moral Panics and the Media”, by C. Critcher, an anthology of essays, which is borrowable. I’ve requested it.

You can read the third edition online by clicking on the link. :wink:

Couple weeks ago, I took my 5-year-old son to the doctors for shots. In the waiting room, we sat and read a book on birds. A woman came over and told me how well I was doing with him.

??

I know she meant well, but really? He’s my son! Why does she seem surprised that I’m not ignoring him or something?

So in other words, it’s being irrationally fearful and self-absorbed.

Sounds like a good way to get yourself thrown in jail while reinforcing the beliefs of the busybodies, not to mention scaring your own kids. Guys do have to defend themselves from this kind of thing because it’s gotten insane, but trying to intimidate at crowds of women in parks is probably not the way to go.

The idea that a man should ever have to defend himself against this malarky is nauseating. The fact is, men are essential in child-rearing. They’re capable, and they’re wonderful at it in general. I don’t understand these crazy women who accuse random strangers of random things. Some dude in a park is taking pictures? So what! It’s a park. Telling some guy he needs to “babysit” his own kids? I don’t think so. Dads take care of their children just like moms do. No babysitting involved.

I certainly hope that people GROW UP. Men are competent, people. (aimed at the idiots, not the dopers) Women are competent, too. Why should anyone assume the worst? Statistics say the worst is NOT what’s going on.

Last week, I was playing in the YMCA pool with my two-year-old. He was going down the slide in the wading/water park area, and I was holding his hand as he was going around to the steps from the base of the slide. This little (about 2 ½) girl came along, and started going down the slide, too. She was very friendly, and I would give her a hand getting up in the water. She finished up, and says, “Bye-bye!” I reply in turn, and she runs up and gives me a big hug. My expression of “I’m having fun with my son and his new friend,” changed immediately to “Oh shit!!!” Her mother came running up, yelling, “Isabella - that is not appropriate!!” And she started apologizing to me.

I told her there was no problem - I was just afraid that she might think I was some sort of perv. She asked why, and I told her that, as a man playing with children, one of my biggest fears is that someone accuse me of being a perv… for playing with my kids.

“Don’t worry about it,” she replied, “some people are just idiots.”

I like Isabella’s mom.

I’ve gotten that. The response that worked best for me is “No, they’re mine”.

Regards.
Shodan

In my troubled youth, I learned not to argue with cops.
Many, probably even most of them are all right, but it only takes one asshole to throw you in the slammer for a “garde à vue” that always seems to end right after the last subway’s gone. (don’t think the US has those - essentially, the cops here have the right to detain you for 24 hours. According to the law I just checked, it only applies if you’re “suspected of having commited or are about to commit a crime that would land you in jail”, but in practice, it’s pretty much whenever they want. For example, forging ID is a jail offense, so they can throw you in the can to check if your ID’s real and you’re not an illegal alien.)

@Freudian Slit : I wish I had that kind of wit, but I’m stuck with my esprit de l’escalier. Still, I’ll keep that one in my pocket, in case there’s a next time :slight_smile:

My dad was a stay at home dad from when I was 5 until about two years ago when my youngest sibling left the nest. He did it in a time where fewer dads did it, but where there was less moral panic about a man alone with kids…