I wonder if there is a “real life” example of the trope on the page for the chains of simultaneous organ donations with a lot of people who are incompatible with the person they are trying to help, but are compatible with person B, who is incompatible with their loved one but is compatible with person C, etc.
In practice it sounds like a hell of a lot of surgery to help one person. I don’t see carrying such a chain beyond maybe one step removed from a one-on-one donation.
Less critically, I’ve heard of debt brokers who help businesses who have uncollectable accounts receivable of their own negotiate chains of mutually agreed debt forgiveness. In such cases at least getting large debts off the books can help businesses refinance, etc.
The single institution living kidney donor transplant chain took place over two days. Five donor and five recipient surgeries were performed on each day. Surgeons transplanted healthy kidneys from 10 different donors into 10 recipients who could have waited years for a transplant.
The record was 35 people, though
Kathy Hart, a Good Samaritan donor, started Chain 357, the longest chain in the world, on January 6, 2015. Her generous gift to a stranger began at the University of Minnesota Medical Center and the chain ended at UW Health in Madison, Wisconsin on March 26, 2015.
The final recipient in the chain was a voucher holder whose donor donated on August 5, 2014. “Our longest chain prior to 357, included 60 surgeries and took 5 months to complete. Chain 357 included 70 surgeries and took about half the time to complete, showcasing the tremendous progress achieved in streamlining the paired exchange process,” explained Garet Hil, Founder and CEO of the National Kidney Registry and a voucher donor himself.
If I understand it correctly, it doesn’t help just one person. If there are ten donors and ten recipients, then ten people get helped.If some of the recipients would have been able to find a donor without this chain, it would have been the same number of surgeries.
Yeah that’s the way it works. Simple example: Persons A, B and C all need a kidney, but their best friends don’t match. However, A’s friend A’ does match B and B’s friend B’ matches C. If C’s friend C’ matches A, or if good Samaritan S matches A, then a chain happens (and in the case with a good Samaritan, one selfless person is helping three people (by motivating the other friends to participate)
Note that this is not a comic book. This is a page from the The Union Springs Herald (published in Union Springs, Alabama) on February 22, 1973. It appears that the section of the page with the camel story came from some company that distributed such things to many newspapers. When I click on the website for that newspaper, I get some URLs for this year, so it still exists. It’s a weekly newspaper. It’s not clear if it’s only online or if it’s also actually printed and available that way. Darren_Garrison, did you read this in a comic book or in a newspaper? In any case, it’s not clear if anyone ever believed this trope or if it was made up to fool people.