DEATH PENALTY

why is only premedidated murder punishable by the death penalty or life in prison? (in the US)
why aren’t rape and child molestation or even ATTEMPTED premeditated murder punishable by death or life in prison?
were they ever capital crimes in american history?
why are we so lenient when it comes to these terrible crimes? im looking for the reasoning behind this, not “because of liberal judges”
thanks

You’d have to search the legislative history to find out. A lot of it has to do with the morals of America at different times in history.
I really don’t know if this is still the case, I’m almost afraid to ask, but at one point, because of the felony murder rule, if you killed someone through oral or anal sex that was 1st degree murder. What a way to go though…
There are good cases why all your suggestions should be life imprisonment (death penalty…I dunno). WHY they aren’t I can’t specifically tell you other than we’ve decided as a society that murdering someone is a much worse crime than not murdering them.

Murder is not the only crime punishible by death in the US. Other state offences punishable by death include train wrecking, treason, drug trafficking, and kidnapping.

Federal law allows the death penalty in cases of espionage, treason, drug trafficking, and conspiracy to commit murder upon a witness, juror, or officer of the court in cases involving a continuing criminal enterprise. It is also a US federal crime to commit a terrorist murder upon a US citizen in another country.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice prescribes the death penalty for an even wider variety of crimes, but only when committed during time of war.

See http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org for specifics.

I am writing without specific references, just distant memories of Political Science 2 or 3000 something I had to take in college.

The Supreme court in the early 70’s ended the death penalty as states had written them. Crimes short of Murder, or capital murder, were not killable offenses. Or something like that. I know I am not exact, but this is the gist of it. Rape used to be an offense that could be punished by death in some states.

I do note a bias toward death in your argument. Personally, I agree. You kill someone, you die. Legally, prosecuters have proven to be evil evidence witholding, we’re going to prosecute SOMEBODY at all cost, forced confession scum. Until they clean up their act, I have to temper my opinion.

Now if you just rant back it can become a GD!

From the Uniform Code of Military Justice, there’s too many to cut and paste. In wartime, crimes which may be punishable by death include desertion, assaulting or wifully disobeying a superior officer, misbehavior before the enemy (itself a laundry list of offenses involving cowardice, disobedience, negligence, failure to do one’s duty, etc.), attempting to compel one’s superior to surrender, improper use of countersign, aiding the enemy, spying, and misbehavior of sentinel (i.e., drunkenness or sleeping or leaving one’s post while on guard duty). (Some of these don’t actually specify that death may be imposed only in time of war, but speak of conduct involving the “enemy”, so I assume they would apply only in war. However, it’s possible that an “enemy” during a “cold war” might qualify.)

Crimes which may be punishable by death, even in peacetime, include mutiny or sedition (and failure to suppress or report same), forcing a safeguard (which I don’t even know what the hell means), espionage (if it involves “(A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (B) war plans, © communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy”), willful improper hazarding of a vessel, and rape.

And of course various flavors of murder are capital offenses under Georgia, U.S., and U.S. military law.

For a specific and famous example, Caryl Chessman was executed in the San Quentin gas chamber for his convictions of kidnapping and sexual molestation.The california penal code no longer allows for a death penalty for criminals who do not actually kill someone, and these require “special circumstances.” The “ordinary” murderer in California is likely to get a life sentence of three types: life w/o the possibility of parole; 15 years to life; and 25 years to life. In the era of “three strikes,” we have many inmates serving inderterminate life sentences, such as “25 to life” for shoplifting. There are nearly 600 condemned inmates in California.

The Federal system, including the UCMJ for the military, allows the death penalty for those who are found guilty of treason and disertion from duty in combat situations.

In some other countries, you can be put to death for committing adultery, embezzelment, and not towing the party or religious line.

MEBuckner in citing the Georgia statutes brings to mind an interesting question: I note that GA has the death penalty for Treason. Is it possible to commit treason against the state of Georgia (as opposed to the US as a whole)? Has anyone ever been convicted of treason against one of the “several states”? I beleive John Brown was hanged in 1860 (or 59?) for treason against Virginia.

From the way the Georgia statute is written, it’s clearly possible to commit treason against the state of Georgia:

And, yes, John Brown was indeed charged with (among other things) “treason against the commonwealth of Virginia”. (See John Brown’s Raid)

With respect to the Georgia statute, I can see “levying war against” Georgia. If I go out and organize a private army and we start shooting Georgia state troopers and march on the governor’s mansion, that’s treason against Georgia. (I’m sure that these days the Federales would quickly become involved in a case like that as well, but Georgia would at least have the option of charging me under its own laws as well.) What I find a bit puzzling is the idea of adhering to or giving aid and comfort to the “enemies” of Georgia. Can a state (“state” in the American sense) have “enemies”? Per Section 10 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution, states can’t make treaties or enter into alliances or confederations, and they can’t wage war. Well, a state can wage war if it’s actually invaded. But it seems to me that in that case, any “enemy” of Georgia would automatically be an “enemy” of the United States as well. The phrasing of the Georgia statute makes me think of some bizarre scenario where those water-rights disputes with Alabama or Florida get out of hand, and they start charging people with treason for giving “aid and comfort” to the dastardly Alabamians.