…one time.
Now that we have defended marriage against the threat the same sex onslaught in California and beyond, we need to move on in protecting this sacred institution.
Write your congressman and insist that there be legislation to further protect marraige. The greates destroyer of marriage is divorce. We must eliminate this threat before it unravels the very fabric of our society.
WHEREAS Marriage is the union of a Man and a Woman for the purpose of procreation, no person may enter into marriage if procreation is not possible within that marriage or if procreation is not intended.
A person shall be guilty of a crime, punishable by not less than five years imprisonment, or $100,000, or both if:
A. That person is incapable of procreation;
B. That person’s intended spouse is incapable of procreation;
C. That person does not produce an offspring with his or her spouse within five years of marriage;
D. That person intends, whether that intention is made known or not, to not produce an offspring.
Makes as much sense as banning same-sex marriage.
YAAAAY I get to do one!!!
Ahem…
WHOOOOSSSSHHHHH!!!
Plus, since a child needs both a mother and a father, when a parent dies, any children must immediately be taken from the remaining single parent and placed into foster care.
Well obviously divorce needs to be outlawed. Then we need to stop those slutty widows from marrying someone other than their brother-in-law. And of course of a man’s wife is barren she must give him her maid to impregnate.
I have yet to hear who this ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN is. Have their names been published? Who decided which ONE MAN marries which ONE WOMAN? Will there be a separate vote?
If it were me deciding, for the sake of the nation I would volunteer to be the ONE MAN. Now, for the ONE WOMAN…hmmmm, does Jessica Alba have a cuter younger sister?
I thought it was “one man minus one woman”, which would—by my calculations—leave a smoldering rib lying on the ground.
I liked what Tina Fey, as Sarah Palin, said on SNL, referring to Palin’s daughter. Something like “marriage is a sacred institution between two unwilling teenagers.”
Sorry, I must have missed anyone getting whooshed. Where was it?
See post #3.
Does it count as two now?
You just quoted it. 
E. If it is determined that either person in the marriage is doing anything to prevent conception; i.e. using contraceptives or not having normal sexual relations.
To be fair, we should give them say…3 months to remarry. If they miss the cutoff, then take the kids away.
That will go over best in Arkansas, where it is now illegal to adopt a child if you are single. Surely if you can’t adopt one, how can it be moral to keep one if you are single?
Think of the children!
And “Not tonight, Dear, I have a headache” should be an illegal excuse.
Whoosh right back atcha, Tiger.
I thought humor threads were disallowed in GD?
Stop being such a sourpuss.
The debate is; divorce is the number one destroyer of marriage. Now that we have defended marriage against the gay agenda, do you not agree we should not now protect it against its number on threat, divorce?
That’s an awful idea. The old saw about making it harder to get married and easier to get divorced has some merit though.
The remaining spouse is hurled onto the funeral pyre surely?
Good grief man, we are living in civilized times here!
That only happens if there are no children.