Democrats take the House and have a shot at the Senate. Election Fraud my ass.

See, this is that false equivalence I’m talking about. The moment you pretend like there is any sort of parity in dirty deceptive bullshit between the current parties is the moment you start people shrugging their shoulders and saying, “Gee, yeah, everyone does it, so what can we do.” Why not have the guts to call it like it is without feeling compelled to say, “Well, the Republicans are really bad, but then the Democrats were bad back in the days of Tammany Hall or out in Chicago in the early part of the last fucking century.”

It’s like saying “Yeah, the Raiders commit a lot of personal foul penalties, but then again the Steelers do too. Football must just be a rough and dirty game.”

If you were truly concerned about democracy, you wouldn’t say such things. The Postmaster General has a non-voting but advisory seat on the RNC, and 97% of all mail-sorting machines are manufactured by Diebold. Vote by mail, indeed.
[sub]Kidding, kidding! Jesus…[/sub]

Sometimes cheating isn’t enough to win. If there is no evidence of election fraud, then why is the FBI investigating irregularities in Virginia?

But there are apparently provisions that allow you to drop a completed ballot off at the library. And we have the librarians in our pockets. Muhahahaha!

It may be a little early to tell, but I think we could be safe to say that the Senate will remain in control of the Senate.

If I were a total Dem partisan on this issue I’d say that clearly there is no voter fraud and there’s nothing wrong with the voting machines, now that Dems have won 28 governorships and we have control of the most voting machines.

I don’t say that. I still want a verifiable voting system. I want the current system of winner-runs-the-election to be replaced by a system where elections are won by a nonpartisan organization.

And I want similar nonpartisan orgs to draw up House and Senate districts, not the fucking election winners. That’s just stupid, an invitation to gerrymandering.

Dem or Pubs in power, that’s how I feel, because having a real democratic process is more important than who wins.

How do ya like that?

Make that "where elections are run by a nonpartisan organization. ’

:smack:

So that somehow makes your premature rantings more valid?

I dunno, I think the Senate’s been out of control for a while now.

Wow, the logic of Mr. Doors is fucking amazing. Because clearly if any Democrat ever wins any office, then the Republicans aren’t cheating and never had. The fact that, say, some Democrat it Montana wins a senatorial seat somehow means that all of the evidence of misconduct in Florida and Ohio NEVER HAPPENED! And the robocalling scam this year NEVER HAPPENED NEITHER!

This guy’s been on board for over five years and still utters this kind of nonsense. It’s taking longer than we thought, isn’t it?

I think this post deserves repeating, seconding, or whatever else can be done by way of giving kudos to it. Yes, in my opinion, there was clearcut evidence of some fraud by Republicans in Florida in 2000. There are also allegations that are suspicious but not proven there and in Ohio in 2004. And there were a couple of instances where the Democrats engaged in dirty tricks. And, rather famously, the 1960 elections were not taken through a 2000-style controversy because Tricky Dick, in perhaps his finest moment ever, refused to protest very suspicious returns from Chicago that would have switched Illinois’s electoral vote and perhaps the whole election.

I know, for a fact, that there was a bit of fraud at one precinct in New York State in the midterm election of 1978. In the only occasion we’ve ever done so, my wife and I cast write-in votes for a candidate who had lost the primary. We educated ourselves and made sure to cast our vote including the write-in properly. In the reported tally for our county, Mickey Mouse got his traditional five write-in votes, but the candidate we had written in was not listed. We’re firmly convinced that the poll workers just couldn’t be bothered to read the machines for write-ins, and didn’t bother with them.

So – the fact that by and large elections are conducted and the votes reported fairly does not void the point that occasionally they are not. And on those occasions, the chicanery needs to be brought to light and the offenders punished after trial.

Airman, you’re clearly a intelligent guy, but you puzzle the heck out of me sometimes. I’ve tried to tell you this, others have tried to tell you this, maybe it will succeed this time. Now, please read this carefully.

One of the scariest things about the electronic voting machines with no paper trail is that the software used to tally the votes can be constructed to overwrite itself at the end of the day. That means there’s not going to be any evidence. Not last time, not this time, not ever. Arguably, one person centrally located could set this up; that’s not exactly a big conspiracy. The voting machines must be updated for each election. Therefore they are open to some fairly centralized manipulation. This is a fact, not some kind of tin-foil hattery.

Has there been election fraud in the past? I have no idea. But if there was, that says nothing about whether or not there was election fraud this year, and it says nothing about future elections. I repeat, the voting machines must be updated for each election.

The particularly frightening thing about these machines is that election manipulation can take place on a very large scale without paper and with very few people involved. It is therefore not comparable to ballot stuffing, people voting without valid IDs, or even poorly designed butterfly ballots. The potential here is huge, and I say again, if done correctly, will leave no evidence. I’m speaking here as someone who has been a computer programmer for thirty years - in short, exactly the kind of person who could do the work if I had the right job and no morals.

WHY in the name of Og would you appear to be unwilling to take measures against this kind of election-stealing, whether or not it has yet occurred? Because regardless of whether or not it has in the past, I can flatly promise you that if things remain as they are now, with no verifiable paper trail, this kind of fraud will occur in the future. And if all you ever do is sit there and say “prove it,” then you can kiss democracy goodbye in the long run.

As for you, xtisme, I swear most fundamentalist Christians have less faith in Jesus than you have in the concept of incompetent government versus competent private enterprise. What makes you so sure that government and industry differ so in ability? The employees of large corporations are exactly comparable to those in government; they have equally little stake in the outcome of the entity as a whole and they are just as hard to fire.

The RFPs you rail against were done locally. The small governmental entities that were responsible for purchasing voting machines were every bit as accountable and probably far more vulnerable to the consequences of a bad decision than the corporations you apparently admire so much. The marketplace does a pretty good job of punishing small businesses for incompetence (as long as you’re not very rich or well-connected to begin with), but the electorate does a pretty good job of punishing small government entities for incompetence as well.

By all means, believe what you want. But realize it’s as much an article of faith as any creationist’s wet dream.

Reports of dirty tricks, glitches with e-voting

Great OP there, genius.

That’s a popular belief, but I don’t buy it.

Nixon wasn’t above asking for a recount. He just had his henchmen take the lead.

Seriously. Why is the fact they could have lost anyway ignored? Victory for the Dems is no reason to get complacent on fears of voting fraud, and it may be our first real opportunity to do something positive about our electoral system’s obvious inability to handle a close election, and the terrible potential for chicanery to swing a result when the margins are thin.

This time, many of those margins weren’t all that thin. At all. Where they were, close scrutiny is still of utmost importance.

I had a friend in grade school who cheated off my test. Honestly, I can’t remember if I knew about it in advance, but I definitely knew about it after he got a 0. Was the 0 for getting caught? No. He simply got the lines mixed up and put the answer for line 2 on line 3, and so on.

Cheating tells about your ethics, not about your success. Prisons are filled with unsuccessful cheaters.

:stuck_out_tongue: Either you didn’t read what I wrote (the most likely scenerio), or I wrote it very poorly indeed (possible, as I didn’t really go into a lot of detail I suppose). I KNOW the government is incompetent when it comes to contracting, and that the contractors are corrupt and will get away with anything the government lets them get away with. This isn’t faith based…its reality based.

I’m reasonably sure that the shitty eVoting machines we seem to have been served up with are a combination of poor government oversite, poor government grasp of what exactly they were looking for, poor government RFP’s and follow up, with poor contractor support and lots of general government/contractor fuckup-ery…i.e. the problem is business as usual in the government contracting world. What I DON’T see, which was my point, is some vast shadowy conspiricy by the Republican right to steal elections wholesale. This isn’t to say there haven’t been Republican shinanigans…or Democratic ones either…its to say I don’t see a national conspiricy of them. I’ve seen zero evidence to support such a conspiricy theory. All the evidence I’ve seen fits nicely into the standard model of government contractor products and general fuckups.

YMMV.

-XT

Oh my. All this talk about eating crow and hue and cry and whackjobs and shit. I was wondering what the initian reactions would be. For tha past 8 years or so - no fucking cites because I don’t really give a damn who thinks what anymore - of variations on “we have a mandate so fuck you” and other variations on the theme of “anything less than total acceptance is not a gracious enough attitude in defeat” and all that other crap, I am feeling spiteful.

I thhink or hope this is the beginning of OUR mandate - the moderates, the center AND the left, and we get to tell all the right wing religio-whatevers FUCK YOU WE HAVE A MANDATE.

That is all.

Don’t forget NEENER NEENER!
There’s still room for a hearty NEENER NEENER!

Wonder how much money gambling-addict, gloater extraordinaire Bricker, lost in this election?

Hope his pocket hurts as much as the drubbing his Party got.