askeptic? Jesus, as per concept, does love you. And everyone. That’s one of the good things about it. Myself, I know how you feel, I was raised without religion, and dragging me into a church makes me feel highly empathetic to vampires.
But you know, she probably meant it nicely. Just say ‘bless your heart’ back at her. And even mean it.
[QUOTE=askeptic]
You have no idea how statements like this are unbelievably offensive to many people, do you?
With that one flippant comment you reduce me and everyone who does not believe in your fairytale to mere cogs in your delusion. Frankly I don’t believe in god and if he did exist I would tell him to fuck off. He may have created the universe but I have to live in it.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=askeptic]
What scares me is that someday people like you will turn this country into a Christian version of Afghanistan under the Taliban. The only thing stopping you is people like DT. People willing to take a stand and say fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
I was in the store the other day and a little old lady said Merry Christmas I smiled and said Merry Christmas back to her. Then she said “Jesus loves you” I wanted to scream fuck you and hit her with a brick. Make no mistake, the path from “jesus loves you” to stoning people in the streets for wearing the wrong head scarf, is amazingly short.
[/QUOTE]
Well, you’ve got the rabid hatred down pretty good, but at least you don’t post in every religion thread. I guess you can stay.
[QUOTE=E-Sabbath]
Stay cool, man. We like you. And goodness knows, I’m not saying you’re wrong, either. Just sometimes hard to discuss things with. In this case, you’re not even hard to discuss with, either. The mirror was just so blantantly there I had to hold it up.
[/QUOTE]
Thanks.
The fact that you expected me to know that my statement would offend you, while not knowing yourself that references to fairy tales and delusions would be offensive to me indicates that our frames of reference are impossibly far apart. I do not believe that I can effectively communicate with you, so I won’t bother trying.
[/QUOTE]
Consider, hypothetically, someone who openly believes that Andrew Jackson was the greatest president of all time. To one who doesn’t believe, the hypothetical Jehovah is far nastier than the real Jackson or whoever wantonly killed off a big chunk of one’s group.
[QUOTE=askeptic]
What scares me is that someday people like you will turn this country into a Christian version of Afghanistan under the Taliban. The only thing stopping you is people like DT.
[/QUOTE]
Well, all righty then.
[QUOTE=Paladud]
Consider, hypothetically, someone who openly believes that Andrew Jackson was the greatest president of all time. To one who doesn’t believe, the hypothetical Jehovah is far nastier than the real Jackson or whoever wantonly killed off a big chunk of one’s group.
[/QUOTE]
Those who hold beliefs about the quality of Elton John’s music generally accept that their beliefs are subjective. A diehard fan may scratch his head in bewilderment at the thought that anyone would dislike ‘Goodbye Yellow Brick Road’, but, if pushed, he would likely accept that musical tastes aren’t set in stone and that people who can’t stand Elton John aren’t wrong in any meaningful sense. In other words, people’s beliefs about music are aesthetic beliefs, and aesthetic beliefs are widely recognised as being idiosyncratic.
In this respect they contrast starkly with a great many religious beliefs. The majority of religious beliefs are not spiritual, not metaphysical, but just plain physical. For instance, the belief that Jesus was born of a virgin is, at its heart, a claim about biology. The belief that he bodily ascended into heaven is a claim about the physical laws governing the universe. In other words, their acceptance is not intended to be a matter of opinion.
I don’t think your comparison is a good one because it doesn’t draw a distinction between subjective beliefs (“I like Elton John”, “Green is my favourite colour”) and objective beliefs (“I have two children”, “Jesus rose from the dead”).
And I am well aware of your existence. I am also aware of how vanishingly small a minority you comprise. Like it or not, millions more people agree with Robertson than you. His personal theology is a popular one, and one only need watch the 700 club to learn that it is steeped in scripture. While his views may be ludicrous and morally repugnant, that is simply because the scripture on which they are based is ludicrous and morally repugnant. To be fair, some aspects of his biblical worldview may be quite enlightened, and for that credit should be given to the authors of the Bible. But that has no bearing on the truthfulness of his philosophy.
I do understand that about him, but I think you need to recognise that while the volunteer and the fraudster may differ in a multitude of ways, they most likely share some very, very odd beliefs about the universe. Der Trihs may condemn them both as evil on the basis of their religious affiliation, whereas I certainly wouldn’t. But I would have no problem judging them to be equally irrational, and their beliefs equally baseless.
I have two problems with religious beliefs as they are popularly held. The first is that they are based on nothing but thin air and wishful thinking. That they are irrational. That they are nonsensical, outlandish, and bizarre to the point of being funny. The second problem I have with religious belief is that some of them can motivate good people to do very bad things. The belief that dying on a battlefield in defence of your religion represents the ultimate sacrament is incompatible with 21st century weaponry. I think that nowadays the stakes are simply too high for us to continue tolerating religious irrationality.
[QUOTE=Paladud]
Consider, hypothetically, someone who openly believes that Andrew Jackson was the greatest president of all time.
[/quote]
I know people who believe that, and I understand why they do. They know why I despise him, and they understand why I do. We respect each other as people.
I must admit that that’s a little hard to grasp — formulating a moral judgment about someone whom I believe to my core has never even existed.
[QUOTE=George Kaplin]
Those who hold beliefs about the quality of Elton John’s music generally accept that their beliefs are subjective.
[/QUOTE]
Well then, that eradicates our differences because I am glad to tell you that my experience with God is completely subjective. I’ve said so quite many times, but probably not when you were around to see it.
[QUOTE=George Kaplin]
Fair enough
[/QUOTE]
You might be interested in a GD discussion I’m hosting about subjective and objective frames. Just look for S5.
I can’t believe you wrote these things back-to-back!
So what you’re saying is, your own very real desire to stone someone for being religious is a means to save us from your imagined culture where the *religious *stone people?
Please tell me you wrote this to be funny. Because, if you’re serious, this is the most unintentionally hilarious thing I’ve read all day.
Incidentally, Mr Dibble, I’m surprised to learn that Der Trihs shuns his Pit threads. It is remarkable that he can call people delusional idiots everywhere on the board except for where it’s supposed to be done.