No, Castro had nothing to do with it. It was a coup to prevent a premature end to the Cold War.
Exactly. People claiming the ‘know’ Oswald was responsible are a dime a dozen.
The Cold War had nothing to do with it. It was part of the ongoing Zygon civil war, simple as that.
And your evidence for this claim is…?
The application of clear thinking and common sense to historical facts.
JFK’s outreach to the designated ‘enemies’ in the Cold War which was tragically cut short by his murder and replacement with a more conventional war hawk.
Neither Cuba nor Russia would stand to benefit from Kennedy’s murder.
That makes as much sense as claiming Russia had anything to do with it. 
Yeah.
Again, where’s the evidence? Your unsubstantiated opinion doesn’t count.
It’s as factually sound as your “coup” nonsense.
But what I’m saying about a coup is not nonsense - these are real things that happened historically and still occur today.
Your belief in a civil war on Zygon, on the other hand… :dubious:
Heck, if your “evidence” consists of who you believe benefitted from the assassination, you may as well pin it on everyone who made a buck writing a conspiracy book about it.
I’m curious if anyone has evidence of a contrary theory actually supported by evidence from the minutes immediately before and immediately after the shooting, i.e. if there was a grassy knoll shooter, were there any bullet fragments found along that path from the fence to the limo toward pool on Houston street. Shadowy conspiracies are bullshit, I want to talk mechanics.
I had breakfast with the President this morning! My evidence: Other people have had evidence with the President in the past.
The evidence that JFK’s policies were in opposition to war hawkish Red Scare and Cold War ideologies can be found in any number of history books.
The reversal of Kennedy’s cooperative efforts after his murder are also a part of the historical record.
So, no - it’s not my ‘unsubstantiated opinion’ - it is a considered judgement based on historical facts.
Now let’s tie these broad historical facts to the actual assassination, shall we? What specific group do you suppose was actually behind the shooting of Kennedy, and who do you suppose pulled the trigger?
I bet more more people made money and careers out of spouting this ‘Oswald did it’ nonsense than ever was made exhibiting skepticism about it.
Is it common for bullets to leave fragments along their trajectories? Were bits of bullet found between the alleged ‘sniper nest’ in the TSBD and the location of the President’s limousine?
Here’s your chance - if you think bullets leave a trail along their trajectories I’d be curious to see you flesh this theory out a little bit.
If you believe you had breakfast with the President of Zygon this morning, I am in no position to argue with you.
You would lose that bet, easily. Why don’t you give us the top ten books that made money telling us that there was no conspiracy and that Oswald did it by himself?
You seem to be in no position to argue, period. Where are your facts specifically about the assassination itself?
Yes, my statement of the historical facts stands in stark contrast to allegations that Cuba would have any reason to murder Kennedy as suggested in the OP.
Occam’s Razor would suggest that those who had a realistic motive would be the most likely culprits.
I don’t have any idea who the trigger men might have been.
As to which groups would be in a position to organize the murder of a politician, the US did have (and likely still has) people on the payroll who specialize in the assassination of people whose politics are inconvenient.
According to this article, most books are anti-Warren Report.
Soooo…you’ve got absolutely nothing(besides vague handwaving, that is) to back up your opinion?