*NJ panel: Christie aide should turn over papers -
By ANGELA DELLI SANTI — Mar. 7, 2014 6:12 PM EST
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A judge should not allow New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s two-time campaign manager a blanket refusal to comply with a subpoena from a state legislative panel investigating a political payback scandal, lawyers for the panel said in a court filing Friday.
The lawyers say that in order to claim privilege, witnesses like Bill Stepien must raise specific objections to particular requests or questions.
…If granted, Stepien’s claim against self-incrimination would eviscerate the government’s ability to use subpoenas to conduct investigations, the lawyers argue.
…Kelly’s lawyer also filed papers Friday, asserting there’s a “real and substantial threat” of self-incrimination if she gives over what state lawmakers have requested.
In the filing, Kelly’s lawyers say federal authorities have requested interviews with Kelly, her parents, her ex-husband and former in-laws. The lawyers say none of them has been willing to talk.
…There has been no evidence directly linking Christie to the planning or execution of the plot. *
http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-christie-aide-fights-order-give-records
This makes it sound like the state legislative panel is on a fishing expedition or is getting desperate. Stepien was dumped because he appeared insensitive to the plight of the people affected by the non-study study. Kelly, at least, was involved with Port Authority Wildstein and Baroni. But what information, relative to the state’s investigation, can come from Kelly’s parents? Or Kelly’s in-laws? And I’m sure Kelly’s ex-husband has only good things to say about his ex-wife. :rolleyes:
Is the government simply harassing Kelly’s relations in order to get her to provide/invent evidence against Christie or is it considered normal, in cases like this, to question the in-laws?