*Ed Rooney (Jeffrey Jones): That is why I have got to catch him this time- To show these kids the example he sets is a first class ticket to nowhere!
Grace (Edie McClurg): Oh, Ed, you sounded like Dirty Harry just then.
- quote from "Ferris Bueller’s Day Off*
You must be aware that there is, currently, no evidence that Christie was involved in the Great NJ Lane Reassignment. So what has led you to believe that Christie is guilty, or that Christie must be guilty, or that Christie should be guilty? Can you describe the logical progression you used to reach your heartfelt conclusion?
Are you familiar with advertising and product branding? If you want to sell cola, or cars, or beer, it’s important to constantly get your product’s name in front of the potential consumers. Buy COKE, COKE, COKE. Buy FORD, FORD, FORD. Buy BUD, BUD, BUD. And don’t forget to include pictures of the product. It seems to me that the media has been using the same age old advertising technique to sell their product. Their product being that Christie must be guilty. Christie this, Christie that, Christie aide, Christie associate, Christie appointee, Christie, Christie, Christie. Display a picture of Christie and the GW Bridge while discussing Port Authority’s Sampson actual involvement in the attempted cover up.
Unfortunately for the lynch mob media, there isn’t any evidence that Christie was involved, let alone guilty. But that hasn’t stopped people from jumping to conclusions. Has it? The media even chose to give a boost to Carl Lewis’s sagging career simply because Lewis mentioned Christie’s name as the reason Lewis couldn’t find work in New Jersey and moved to Texas.
Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-Mercer, was forced to resign from the George Washington Bridge lane closure investigative committee because she insists, without any actual evidence, that Christie must be guilty. Buh-bye Coleman.