The Hebrew word for “breath” is ruach - also often translated as “spirit”. This is where the “soul” comes from, and (according to Genesis) humans are the only ones to possess it. This is also why we are made in God’s image - we have his Spirit within us…
Good question, the crationists have the neatest answer, in that it all started about six thousand years ago and that only humans have souls, unfortunately the creationist position lacks certain other qualities.
If Barney can be used as an archaeological example, I would have to say that no, dinosaurs are decidedly soulless.
Taking the question more seriously for a moment (despite my better judgment); if humans do have souls, then it would be likely IMO that all animals do as well, and the whole bunch of us would always have had them. There is no physical construct to evolve, and evolution (more accurately selection) occurs on a physical level.
Is this another attempt to attack religion using a different tact?
Actually, I fall into the belief that some animals do possess souls, as some animals are better people than so-called real humans. Now, i don’t think they get the same moral code as us to follow, as certain impulses are for them impossible to suppress. Now, dinosaurs are suffeciently cool enough that i think they would make a neat addition in heaven, so i bet some of them are there. But you never know about such things.
And i think Barney would be an example of a Dino that sold it’s soul for fame, and paid the price b becoming lame. Don’t make deals with the devil, kids, don’t be like Barney!
Lions and sharks can kill so long as they attend confession regularly or tithe 10% of their income for the expressed purpose of purchasing indulgences.
Souls [should they exist] by definition survive beyond physical death; your point about them being ‘destroyed’ eludes me.
They had 250 million years to evolve to the point where they could shoot down asteroids. Their failure to do so just shows them as slackers. Sloth is one of the deadly sins. Therefore–> dead dinos!
From the Creationist standpoint, it seems to me that there is an easy answer (as Mangetout alluded earlier): God created Man with souls, and likely did not give them to animals.
What I would be interested in is how Christians who allow for evolution to have occurred account for the possibility of an afterlife.
Note: No agenda here! Honest curiosity!
Specifically, the afterlife (heaven, hell, whatever) requires some sort of intangible “soul” (or spirit, or something) to remain after death. If one accepts evolution, then at what point did Man obtain a soul (that is, at what point would early man have been considered by God to be worthy of the addition of a soul)? Or where they there all along, therefore being present in all (animal) life? What, if any, are the moral implications of animals having souls?