If you are even trying to make this incredibly foolish argument, it shows that you understand nothing whatever about the basic issues. So what’s the point of even discussing it with you?
Do you know who else posts about enjoying how much outrage they generate?
I’m not sure, but after comparing John Kerry on a diplomatic mission to Fred Phelps of WBC, I don’t think you’re interested in an honest debate.
I notice that article begins, “It was a fitting time to talk about the weather.” In the author’s opinion, at any rate.
And, just to put it in perspective: Right after Hurricane Sandy hit NJ was a fitting time to talk about climate change.
Bring me the puppies and we’ll test that.
At what point did you actually do that?
If this is what you wanted to discuss, why did you shit up the OP with the bogus comparison?