So if all those Bush admin folks are in on it, is Obama in on it too?
If it was revealed that 9/11 was a conspiracy brought to you by the neocon wing of the Republican party, the Republican brand would be worthless forever. No one would ever forgive political murder on that scale no matter what the reason. So why doesn’t Obama present evidence of this conspiracy? If you know the truth, why doesn’t POTUS know it?
Again I will repeat for emphasis you had better hope it is not a conspiracy. You just outed yourself to a group of infinitely powerful people who murder for fun and profit. Good luck!
Well obviously you guys didn’t actually read the post since it specifically declared that there is no definitive evidence anyone knew.
Secondly, it makes no mention of Obama and only mentions 5 people who may have known.
Thirdly, this isn’t me saying this, so point your fingers elsewhere I just found this theory to be different than the typical 9/11 truther because it explains the building 7 collapse which is still highly debated even in engineering communities as possibly foul play and an “inside job” without having to go so far as to claim the government was behind the whole thing.
It’s pretty simple what’s being claimed here, the head of the FBI knew of the terrorist attack before hand (which isn’t too far fetched considered investigating terrorism is his job), he told a few of the top people in Bush’s cabinet, perhaps a few more people knew and word got to Larry Silverstein, who then set up a demolition of the only remaining building he owned in that complex building 7.
Obviously that leaves some questions to be answered, but its at least not making the claim that for the first time in history a steel frame building collapsed in 6 seconds due to burning office furniture, which is literally what the NIST report says.
No, it was the first high-rise steel framed building to ever collapse due to fire whether the NIST says so or not (which they do not deny), it collapsed in 6 seconds of which there is video evidence and it cites office furniture as the fuel of the fire.
No one here is claiming Building 1 and 2 fell because of the reasons other than those in the official story.
Only building 7 is suspect.
Given the history of high-rise steel frame buildings burning for much longer at much higher intensities and none even losing a single structural support vs the claim that burning office furniture on 4 floors caused a demolition style collapse is not a scientific or rational way to think.
They have a name for it in the scientific community, it’s called denial.
Read what you just wrote. This is what you’re saying might have happened:
“Mr President, FBI Director Freeh is on line one.”
“Thanks. Lou, Dick and Don are here so I’m putting you on speaker phone.”
“Thanks, Mr President. I just wanted to let you know that we’ve detected a plot to blow up the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. It’s going to take place next week. And I was wondering what direction you wanted me to take this. Should I arrest the terrorists and stop the plot? Or do you want me to let it go ahead?”
“Good work, Lou. Thoughts, Don?”
“We can work this into our long standing plans to invade Iraq. Even though it will divert us into a completely different direction. I say we let it proceed.”
“Dick?”
“Well, call me an old-fashioned patriot, but I’m not happy with having the White House destroyed. Can we stop that part of the plot and let the other targets take the hit?”
“Lou?”
“Sure thing. We’ll just plant some agents on that flight and they’ll crash that plane before it reaches Washington.”
“Then I’m on board with this plan. But we should give Larry a call. That’ll give him a chance to rig up Building 7 with some explosives and knock it down at the same time as the attack.”
“Good thinking, Dick. Now I don’t think I have to remind any of you that what we’re doing is technically a major crime. So we need to keep this secret closely confined to the hundred people or so that we’ll need to carry it off in order that it doesn’t get out.”
So, physically a fire on one side of a building at a low temperature would spontaneously cause the building to collapse as if all the lower supports were taken out at once causing the building to fall into itself.
Alright that’s not the type of thing my physics professor would have taught but hey maybe your Russian.
Again let me also reiterate that there is no physical precedent in real life of a steel frame building ever collapsing due to fire alone at any intensity for any duration.
Please list all the buildings that have steel (and just steel) support structures that have survived multi-hour fires with zero firefighting efforts put towards the flames.