Here is a paper that summarises the modern view of everything known to be wrong with Rifes microscopes. https://www.quekett.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Bracegirdle-Rife-microscopes.pdf
What Rife said he saw with his microscope was “tiny bacteria” . He looked at cancer and saw things that he said resembled a bacteria He said he saw tiny versions of tuberculosis, streptococci , typhoid fever, staphylococcus , leprosy and more. He said he saw these in cancers. That a kidney cancer was one, a liver cancer another. lung cancer was actually TB…
So therefore, pathology labs that deal with samples that are sent for determination of bacteria or cancer, would very often show both.
The claim that the Rife observations are not being disproved because no one is looking, is just so wrong. Its routinely tested at pathology … cancer, TB, or both ? Wouldn’t pathology have found both ? but no Rife fooled himself with the idea that the body transmuted the regular bacteria to the miniature version, and the miniature version was in cancer.
He reports how the microscopes had been studied, and found to have all sorts of extraneous equipment. That a Rife microscope was rather boring really, except it had easily made extra features, but nothing useful, so as to make it LOOK like a new invention, with all sorts of high tech additions …
That even for the purpose of holding the sample below the lense, it was done with such a sloppy arrangement, a metal tray sitting on three adjustable height metal balls. It looked like it was a very complicated scientific apparatus, but actually the use of metal balls as the contact point is so slippery, its hopeless. That Rife always sent them incomplete or wrongly assembled, and destroyed the one he had working … ( which was odd because surely if he had a working 50000x optical microscope, he would keep it … )
