I don’t have a number. Zeriel said that 10 year olds are capable of sexualy “manipulating” grown men and tricking them into letting them suck their dicks “for their own gain.”
No, he’s suggesting that the only way you could have gotten laid at 18 was to sleep with 18 year olds with obviously unreliable IDs.
And we know you wouldn’t dare do that.
The age of consent was 16, but I pretty much didn’t sleep with anyone under 20. Not that I didn’t try, it just happened that I wasn’t successful with anyone under 20 (except in high school, but that doesn’t count since I was under 18 too).
I never guessed at age, though. I always knew who I was sleeping with.
Do think ZPG was lying? And even if he/she was, why get your panties in a twist about it?
Now, I’m not even sure if I can trust my own ID. Maybe I’ve been molesting myself all these years!
I think ZPG was trolling, and you’re still not getting the context.
The situation can be avoided by minors simply not carrying and presenting fake IDs (especially since that act is clearly illegal, with no ambiguity as to whether or not a given case is in fact a violation). Ergo, by your own reasoning, this is not a problem worth worrying about.
Right. Everyone knows the only true way to determine a girl’s age is to chop her in half and count the rings.
No, because the situation we’re trying to avoid is minors getting raped. Just because they have a fake ID doesn’t mean you are entitled to rape them.
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying. Impressive that you flail so wildly and yet hit a bullseye each time.
The situation we’re discussing at the moment is deception by illegal ID.
Sorry, someone already made that joke, oh, two threads ago.
(bolding mine)
Are you SHITTING ME?
Did you really just say that to piss Dio off, or do you actually mean it? You think a ten year old is capable of sexually manipulating an adult man for her own gain? Do you forget what it’s like to be ten?
There is no possible context in which a ten year old is the responsible party in a sexual encounter with an adult. None whatsoever. Children are not psychologically capable of consenting to sex. Period. They do have sexual desires, but any capitalization on those desires is exploitation. Period.
What you have said is unbelievably cruel to child victims of sexual abuse.
I fear my question of post #223 is being lost in the chaos.
No, Dio’s just been ignoring anything he doesn’t have a convenient bullshit answer for.
It was a good question and bears repeating though…
I answered it already.
This is a nice speech, but I don’t see where **Zeriel **said, or implied, that accepting an offered blowjob from a ten year old is acceptable behavior. A kid’s attempt to manipulate sexual desires (and I would think offering someone a blowjob for $5 qualifies as manipulation) does not excuse the adult from allowing himself to be manipulated.
There’s a lot of hair-trigger outrage on this topic, and not all of it from Monsieur le Comte de Balzac, celebrated guest of this thread.
If you was interested in anything more than wanking over your own perceived “cleverness”, the least you could have done was provided a link, so people don’t have to wade through a pile of shite to find these “answers”.
It os not possible for a 10 year old to be capable of sexual “manipulation” at all.