The article you linked says the investigation is ongoing. One usually complete an investigation before charging suspects.
I mean, maybe it will all be swept under the rug, but that’s not what I’m getting from the article.
The article you linked says the investigation is ongoing. One usually complete an investigation before charging suspects.
I mean, maybe it will all be swept under the rug, but that’s not what I’m getting from the article.
We’ll see. To me, it reads like OJ’s ongoing search for the real killers, but I guess we’ll find out.
Consider the fact the war is not over. At best, there is an agreement to stop fighting. Hamas is still in power and have killed Palestinians to stay in power. That means their avowed effort to destroy Israel is intact.
Israel has a vested interest in screening the relief efforts entering what is still a war zone. Doctors Without Borders knew this and chose not to cooperate.
This would be relevant if Israel actually had any interest in ensuring enough aid reaches Gazans, but their actions up until now demonstrate that they don’t. They put an incompetent bunch of clowns in charge of aid and are now rejecting the actual professionals under bullshit justification. No wonder DWB and other actual aid orgs are reluctant to cooperate when Israel has already killed so many aid workers.
Their action of letting lots of aid into Gaza shows that they have no actual interest in ensuring aid reaches Gazans? OK.
The only evidence that they were an “incompetent bunch of clowns” is the testimony of the same Hamas collaborating pieces of shit they replaced who of course have a vested interest in presenting their replacements as an “incompetent bunch of clowns”.
As noted above, there are 20+ organizations of ‘actual professionals’ who agreed to be vetted, unlike the bunch of terrorists DWB wants to continue collaborating with.
You already agreed earlier that the GHF was an incompetent bunch of clowns. Now you’re taking it back?
And who the hell are the twenty orgs going along with this? More Trumper bozos like the GHF? If all you got is a cite that the IDF says there’s twenty orgs, that’s worth exactly nothing.
Do you need me to quote what I said above? That they’re miles and miles and miles better than the terrorist collaborators that are UNRWA and affiliated groups?
I don’t accept that, but let’s presume they’re as bad as you say – the GHF is still an incompetent bunch of clowns, and if Israel actually wanted to ensure Gazans were properly fed, they would have put competent and experienced aid experts in charge of aid, not Trumper bozos.
It’s reality, whether you accept it or not. ![]()
According to your terrorist collaborators, yeah.
The supposed “experts in the field” said there’s no way to distribute aid without working with Hamas. They’re experts in the field of collaboration with terrorists, that’s about it.
I have no idea what Trump has to do with this but we can take a moment to share our mutual dislike of him if you want. Boo, Trump, boo!
This guy named Babale agreed with me earlier in the thread that the GHF were “a bunch of incompetent bozos”, and said they were only a “slight improvement” over the previous guys. I guess he’s a “terrorist collaborator”?
Have you really already forgotten that the GHF are evangelical Trumper bozos with zero aid experience? This was just a few weeks ago…
Are you okay?
I didn’t agree that they were “a bunch of incompetent bozos”, I agreed that they were “A bunch of incompetent bozos and a massive improvement over the intentionally malicious people there beforehand”.
Any time that you try to quote me out of context I will continue to correct you, because you are intentionally leaving out crucial context that completely reversed how I feel about the GHF.
If they were just “a bunch of incompetent bozos”, it would obviously be a bad thing if they are responsible for distributing aid in Gaza, and that’s obviously the impression you’re trying to create by paraphrasing me out of context.
My actual meaning, that they are “A bunch of incompetent bozos and a massive improvement over the intentionally malicious people there beforehand”, clearly shows that them taking over aid distribution is a good thing, because it’s a massive improvement.
So again, any time in the future when you try to claim that I “agreed that the GHF are incompetent bozos”, I will continue to correct you and point out that they were indeed a massive improvement over the intentionally malicious UNRWA and other terrorist collaborators. I’ll thank you if you save us all the trouble and stop claiming that I think the GHF was a bad thing, because this repetitive nonsense is extremely boring.
And I still don’t know what Trump has to do with the GHF. I don’t give a shit about whether GHF members supposedly support Trump, or Kamala, or Stein, or RoboNixon. I care about whether they collaborate with terrorists.
Your words. Only a “slight improvement”.
You also quoted me here:
Yes, in one post I mistakenly said it was a “slight” improvement because indeed I’m not a huge fan of them and was trying to convey that. But a dead polar bear would be a massive improvement over Hamas collaborators. The other posts you yourself quoted show this. For example:
Ha! I think you just let a bit of truth slip through - the GHF really is a bunch of Trumper bozos, and really no better than a dead polar bear at running aid to needy people.
The truth I let slip through is that a dead polar bear is indeed better than terrorist collaborators who view aid distribution as means to entranch the conflict.
Even if true, none of this absolves Israel of knowingly putting clowns in charge of aid. This decision, “just about the second worst option” in your words, probably lead to hundreds of avoidable civilian deaths, if not many more.
This entire conflict is happening because of how many years we have allowed Hamas to entranch itself by going with “the first worst option”, and that’s caused thousands of preventable deaths.
Still doesn’t absolve Israel for the decision to put clowns in charge of aid, causing many avoidable civilian deaths.
I think you’re agreeing with me again… but “Hamas bad!” – even “Hamas WORSE!” – doesn’t absolve Israel of atrocious decisions that cause avoidable civilian deaths.
I don’t find “But Netanyahu!” or “But Trump!” particularly convincing.
Exactly – let’s judge Israel just on the decisions they made, without comparing to other parties. Israel made the decision to put the clowns of the GHF in charge. They didn’t have to do this – there are plenty of aid experts in the world who have not been accused by the IDF of collaborating with Hamas. But Israel didn’t ask them – they put the bozos of the GHF in charge. Israel’s decision, and Israel can and should be judged for making such an awful decision that lead to avoidable civilian deaths.