[QUOTE=t-bonham@scc.net]
Well, this is probably accurate – north of 48°N, at least 90% (probably more like 95%) of the human population is gone, so that’s not surprising. When you’re in the really sparsely-settled wide open northern regions, there aren’t a whole lot of social people to cause “social problems”.
[/QUOTE]
Your idea that north or 48°N is sparesely populated, and that as a result there would be no social problems, is a bit of a sweeping generlization.
I don’t know if you mean north of the 48th in North America, or the world.
If you mean the world, then people north of 48°N would include all of Scandinavia, the Brisitsh Isles, the Benelux countries, most Frenchmen, most Germans, Poland, and almost all Russians and Siberia. Not exactly a small population. I don’t know if that isn’t more than 5% of the world’s population.
If you mean only in North America, the number of people living in Canada’s four western provinces and three territories plus Americans in Alaska probably totals something like 10 million people, making them only about 2% or less of the people in NA (Mexico, Cuba, and Central America are actually part of NA.)
But that does not change the fact that cities like Vancouver, an urban area of a couple of million, have enormous drug and crime problems. Winnipeg, Calgary, and Edmonton are all cities of 500,000 to a million with all the social problems of urban areas.
Don’t let Nelson Eddy and Rosemarie fool you. Pristine wilderness be damned. The vast majority of Canadians live in urban areas with traffic jams, crime and all the other fun stuff that comes with urbanization.
And even when you get to the sparsely populated northern Canada, there are enormous problems with alcoholism and the crimes that come from drunkenness. Teenagers in Canada’s north often turn to gasoline-sniffing and worse.
You are right that social problems may disappear if you go far enough, but it would have to be the north pole where there are no human inhabitants, ergo, no social problems 