Looking at websites that list various strains, you’d think you were taking totally different drugs based on the effects of the strain.
But isn’t weed at root just THC & CBD?
Is this like coffee where you have 100 different flavors and varieties but at root its all just caffeine? Or tobacco where you can have 100 different cigarettes, pipes and vapes but its all just nicotine?
Or are there massive differences in the effects of different strains of marijuana?
Yeah I know, but the psychoactive ingredient in coffee is the same. There are 100s of different coffees, but the psychoactive ingredient is all the same. Just difference doses.
It seems to be the same with weed, just different concentrations of THC & CBD. I’ve heard there are tons of other psychoactive ingredients in weed (CBL, CBN, etc), but I don’t know.
There are two strains, Indica and Sativa. then there are varieties like Panama Red, Acapulco Gold, Sinsemilia, etc. They come from different growing methods.
It’s a psychological effect - so if you can convince someone it’s different, technically, it is.
In a blind taste test, so to speak, of course it’s all the same except for the amount of effect.
Since they legalized it in Canada, the Ontario Cannabis Store has become a source of great amusement. Every kind of chronic has a description that seems stolen from a snooty wine website; “Teal Eyebulge has a sweet, earthy taste with hints of citrus, chocolate, and Quaker State.”
Different weeds can certainly have different scents and tastes; this is a product of the terpenes in the grass, which give it its distinct stoner odor. There isn’t really any chocolate in there, though, and no one is carefully formulating your Sante Fe Ferocious that stringently for taste. I doubt even the most experienced stoner would really taste the citrus if you didn’t suggest it was there.
To their credit, though, the OCS provides THC and CBD levels, and they do range a fair amount. THC levels vary from 5 to 30 percent, which is a hell of a difference, and CBD ranges from nothing at all to twelve percent - CBD can offset THC effects.
Yeah, there’s a lot of bullshit marketing terms. Part of it comes from the fact that drugs are experience goods whose characteristics are difficult to ascertain without consuming them. You also have to take into account that the people assessing them were, of necessity, high at the time.
Discussion of drugs and their effects is often superlative. And just like with LSD, when people have different experiences, they often attribute the variation to the drug being different (e.g.:“bad acid”) rather than to their mindset, setting and dose even if the latter are usually more important factors.
We’re still not allowed to talk about present experience openly on this board, right? Alright:
Hypothetically,
I’ve noticed that strains described as indica tend to make me anxious and depressed, sometimes badly twisted up inside, whereas sativa strains tend to add a light positive accent to whatever I’m doing. I would have expected it to be the other way around so, Your Marijuana Might Vary.
Having experienced both landrace sativas and indicas, I can say that at their extremes, pure sativas make me more interested in doing things, while pure indicas make me unable to get off the couch.
There are over 100 cannabinoids found in Cannabis. Most of them I see are listed as non-psychoactive, but then when I poke further I see many of those do interact with CB1 or 2. And there may be other cannabinoid receptors.
There may be differences in bioavailability strain to strain. And that will vary with method of ingestion. But I’m not up to speed on this.
We can but, from what I understand, it has to be theoretical talk or past talk. The moderators likely don’t care but Google, its advertisers and the lawyers in Chicago do.