Do any US states have a no-fault agreement like Ontario's?

I live in Ontario, and under current insurance rules, in the event of an auto claim, each party recovers the cost of damages to their own vehicle from their own insurer, regardless of fault. Quebec and New Brunswick have similar agreements.

So let’s say Mary rear-ends John at a stop light. There is $2,000 damage to each vehicle. John and Mary submit their damages to their own insurers. Each insurer pays for the damages to their own insured vehicles. John does not pay a deductible (he has a $0 DCPD deductible), and Mary pays her $500 Collision deductible. John’s insurance company is not allowed to subrogate against Mary’s insurer.

Are there any US states that have the same regulations, in which insurers do not subrogate against at-fault third parties? I’ve been searching, but my GoogleFu is weak today.

(Note that I’m only talking about physical damages to a vehicle. Not injuries.)

No-Fault insurance in the US.

About a dozen states have similar laws.

The problem is more people who are broke are driving without insurance. My son got nailed about a week ago by a kid racing another kid. Of course he had no insurance. Our recourse is small claims court with a small limit. If a guy without insurance is involved you get screwed.

I did jury-duty for a case involving no-fault insurance in Michigan. A crack-addicted man was struck by a car (while riding a bike) and received a traumatic brain injury. Under no-fault insurance, the driver’s insurance company had to pay for the man’s treatment, basically for the rest of his life. The man’s substance abuse issues and symptoms intensified as a direct result of the brain injury. He was sent to rehab in Florida for a facility specializing in traumatic brain injuries and substance abuse combined. Insurance didn’t want to pay out, so took the brain-injured man to court.

(They lost.)

I’m familiar with both those pages but unfortunately neither of them, nor the links they provide, make it expressly clear which states are no-fault for physical damage coverages. Every site I find seems to be focused entirely on injury claims.

It’s durn frustrating…

I was going to ask why you can’t recover from your uninsured motorist coverage, but I see that it’s optional in Michigan. I assume you’ve checked that possibility?

Same site; different page. Contact Support

The last column on the chart identifies states with no-fault. Of course, the provisions of each state’s no-fault laws vary. Just to make it fun.

That and you’d still have to demonstrate that your injuries exceed michigan’s verbal threshold for tort liability: Serious impairment of a body function. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(eutuffqoygyt4dfi3fba2445))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-257-58c&query=on&highlight=serious%20AND%20impairment

Oops. I cited the wrong provision above:

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(5q4znjy3lcs5m345er5mckv0))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-500-3135

I am not familiar with other states, but in Louisiana, no-fault is voluntary. Of course one gets a break on rates. Here the coverage is for both property and injury.

Well, as far as I can tell, Michigan is the only state that has something similar to Ontario’s DCPD agreement.

Now I need to find out which states are signatories to Ontario’s DCPD agreement.

Thanks for the links folks.