What is your technical basis, or your knowledge on this fact?
Pilots don’t have pressurization systems in the cockpit, they have altitude systems. There’s a difference between being at deep depth and being far above deep depth (altitude above surfrace). But you wouldn’t know that.
Because I know from sitting on–at a goddamned minmium–an ‘incentive flight’, and having worked with multiple pilots *that the fact that that pilots wear masks *(oh, I know a few), that you don’t (and ICBMs don’t have incentive flight) that your mask is going to bring pressurized air. Aircraft pilots do have computer-sensored air pressurization systems. This is not applicable to airliners.
I read your post, and I know (from bubbleheads’ testimony) that a submarine would absolutely compensate for atmosphtereic pressure. The hull cannot, but inside can. But you wouldn’t know that because you’re hypothesizing again.
Wrong! It does NOT. The pressure hull does, in fact, compress when going from surface to test depth (about 8" in diameter). This has absolutely NO measurable effect on air pressure within the boat.
Thank you. I mean, technically it would be measurable since obviously that’s a volume change, but I assume you meant on an analog pressure gauge that you might have in a 688 class control room.
And thank you for illuminating reasons why the pressure inside would even increase over time, since the CO2 absorbed is decreasing the pressure. I guess it does make sense that if you have a lot of compressed air in a sub, you might as well use it to run machinery.
The context was why a submarine couldn’t just automatically kick on an air compressor when the pressure inside the sub is too high. Bubblehead pointed out that in the submarines he served on, there were a lot of manual systems for critical functions like this, because during that era, digital computers were large and semi-reliable. (the hardened ones that were used for Apollo and for ICBMs that used wire rope memory and hermetically sealed bricks of circuitry would have been ok) Also very expensive.
You jumped in and leveled a bunch of personal insults without even reading my post.
I was simply pointing out that to even get a single pilot jet fighter off the ground, hundreds of very complex control systems that do much more complex things than merely controlling an air compressor in response to pressure are running. Active stabilizers, engine controllers, radios and radars and oh yeah that altitude system, which is more complex as it needs to actually sense the partial pressure of O2.
Anyways, damn straight I’m correct on the facts most of the time. Thanks for the compliment.
Oh, I’ve read your posts. The context is that you continue to waste electrons without a single shred of evidence or knowledge. And what is “wire rope memory” on a missile?
If by asking for a citation and throwing one barb at you is a “bunch,” then you’ve got some pretty thin skin.
In your head, at least.
Still reading what you want, aren’t you?
Tripler
I’ll take the rest back to the Pit, assuming you’ll come out of your “safe space.”