I thought of (and saw this) in another post, and I think it has merit.
Tanks are going to be maneuvering in situations where they are in proximity to friendly vehicles at times, right? Wouldn’t it be rather necessary for a tank or other armored combat vehicle to be equipped with a horn?
And if tanks do have horns, what do they sound like? I’d imagine it would have to be pretty loud to be heard over the noise of the tank’s engine.
The tanks I’ve been around (Danish Leopard 1A5s) had not-particularly-loud electrical horns that sounded like a run-of-the-mill car horn to my untrained ears - they were mostly used to warn bystanders when the tank started moving (obviously, not under tactical conditions). Boring, no ?
One would think that you’d would be very alert when standing around 50 tons of steel that can crush you like a fly, but soldiers are notoriously overtired.
I am sure I remember hearing somebody reflecting on British casulaties in the recent gulf war. He said that the British army suffered an average of 11 casualties a year from accidents with AFVs during training. I don’t recall how many of those were fatal accidents. If British tanks don’t have horns, perhaps they should.
Ex-grunt here. Yes, AFAIK all armored vehicles in the US Army have horns and they are used to warn people that the vehicle is about to do “something.” For example, vehicles with ramps like the M-2/3 Bradley or any of the M113 series, we were required to sound the horn before we dropped the ramp in training situations or in the motorpool.
You usually did not sound the horn if you were backing up because most units required the 2 ground guides when backing up.
The sound? They always reminded me of a loud car horn, rather like on a full sized truck (think Ford 250).