So my friend is taking a genetics class which had a guest lecturer from the LAPD. The police officer basically said that whenever someone is arrested, no matter what the charge, the police take DNA samples and enter them into a database, the same way you would do with fingerprints.
I said, no way, you need someone’s express consent to take DNA samples or you have to produce a warrant. I saw it on “The Wire”!
So, which is it? Or do different states have different laws?
FWIW, I should clarify that case dealt with federal collection of DNA. California has a similar law and it’s currently being challenged by the ACLU. I don’t think the court has yet ruled but the article notes a hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction was to occur in December
The police can take DNA from any person they arrest. That will be kept on file, and can be used in investigations to identify a suspect.
To actually use DNA in court, they will usually take it again, and be very careful about chain of custody, etc., to make it hard for the defense to challenge it in court. Often they will obtain a warrant for this.