Banned why? Because they have a differing opinion & worldview?
“In all honesty, the last three I accidentally backed over with my car. Fortunately they turned out to be drug dealers.”
-Frank Drebin
It does seem like when an unarmed black suspect is shot attacking the police or resisting arrest, the black community expresses outrage. When a white suspect is shot doing the same thing, we think “dumbass”.
Kelly Thomas was white and his killing sparked a lot of outrage.
Black people are generally outraged more, of course, but that is because they are so often treated outrageously by police. I literally have never in my life known a black male who was not at some point unfairly treated by the police. I, conversely, as a white male have never in my life been mistreated by the police, and most white guys I know can say the same.
Do you get routinely pulled over by cops for “checks” that don’t seem to have any probable cause or visible purpose?
Perhaps. But we seem to have a much broader conception of what “resisting arrest” entails when a black guy does it.
Truth be told, the only time I’ve been ever stopped by the cops (as a white guy) was when I was in my teens or 20s. Basically hanging out drinking or otherwise acting in a manner where the cops might want to let us know that we haven’t done anything illegal yet and should keep it that way.
My experience is from having mostly grown up in predominantly white, affluent communities. Most of the black (and Hispanic) people lived in the nearby cities like Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven. We had a couple black guys I went to school with, but for the most part, they were treated the same as everyone else. Except they were really good at basketball or football and you knew not to use racially insensitive jokes around them.
Most of what we “knew” about black people came from what we saw in the news about nearby Bridgeport. Gangs, high crime, poverty, drugs. The only time there was interaction between our town and theirs were sporting events (which often seemed to have a higher than average number of “incidents”) or stories of either suburban kids going to Bridgeport (typically to get drugs or booze) and getting into trouble or Bridgeport kids making their way out to the suburbs (shopping malls in particular) and starting trouble.
Given that some protesters have tried to stop the looting (a couple of nights ago, a group of pastors locked arms trying to prevent criminals from looting, an extremely brave thing to do) I’m going to say yes, most of the protesters care about racism and are not interested in looting.
I’m sure that’s true. The problem is that it only takes a tiny minority to reinforce the stereotypes – and some of the troublemakers might not even be locals. To wit:
Keith Boag is the respected Washington correspondent for CBC News, and this is an excerpt from his take on a related question – whether the Brown shooting itself was inherently the result of racism:
That reasoning would apply to any protest, but it does not mean the protestors “may not care so much.”
A lot of young black men grew up in racially segregated communities with no job prospects and no opportunities, largely as a result of several hundred years of slavery and Jim Crow laws. It’s only natural that they express themselves in the only way they know how - punching random strangers and robbing liquor stores.
“Outside agitators,” eh? :rolleyes:
His face can be seen at around the 37 second mark.
According to police reports some of those arrested were from New York and California – I have no idea how the numbers stack up:
Well, sure, they’ve arrested 11 journalists.
I’m sure many of the people who come to Ferguson MO to protest do so with the good intentions, but of the 51 people arrested Tuesday night/ Wednesday morning only one was a local.