He doesn’t understand we’re here to laugh at him, not to engage him.
What I understand is that you feel an urgent need to discredit me and anything I say. But you don’t go about it in an efficacious manner, to put it mildly. It’s not *as *cringey as the crude and childish way Trump acts when he’s trying to undermine someone, but it’s awfully close to that “full retard” end of the spectrum.
Haven’t we all known people like this, people who peaked in eleventh grade, whether it was being on a winning football team or scoring high on a standardized test, and whose lives have so little else of value that they bring up their trophy every chance they get? I think Slacker really did make that score: it is the grain of gold around which he’s dungbeetled the shitpearl of his life.
SDMB:
Slacker takes yet another loose shit on the floor. Andy, on cue, comes around sticks his finger in the shit, smells it, and yells it “it’s shit again!” with a smug look on his face as the rest of the idiots come circling around to confirm by sticking their fingers in. They all then pat each other on the back with their shit stained hands.
“their” should be “our” in your sentence, right? 
Sure probably
This thread is a plastic-wrap-spread room. It was made to contain the shit. So let’s pat ourselves on the back for keeping it in here! 
See, “efficacious” is the kind of word someone with a high test score would use.
That, or a pretentious wanker.
PICTURE.INSERT("/images/why_not_both_girl.gif")
LOL, touché 
–John Stuart Mill
(Cue ad hominem against Mill from Dibble)
Not your dancing monkey, fuckhead. I’ve posted enough takedowns of Mills elsewhere to not have to bother just because you’re laying out bait.
Obvious troll is obvious, IOW.
But, Oh! It is delightful how much like headless chickens all the racists and misogynists are being, now that the mods are actually waving the banhammer around for a change. Oh, yes, the baseless shouts of bias and censorship are like sweet music to my ears. Doubtless you’re doubly fearful, being both, like a certain dearly departed.
Absolutely delightful. 
Regards,
MrDibble.
Every other time I have cited Mill, you have predictably gone ad hominem. Safe to say you only did not do so this time because I preemptively inoculated against it. I correctly figured you’d be loath to confirm that I have you pegged.
Sure, mate, you’re playing 4D chess, alright… :rolleyes:
See, people, that’s the kind of smarts it takes to be Triple Nein - the kind of smarts that thinks that patently obvious pathetic post hoc arse covering is believable as a Grand Plan.
Must have seemed like a great comeback while you were dabbing, though. It reeks of a hash plan.
Dude, you got called on your obvious trollery. Own it, don’t do … this - whatever you think it is. It’s demeaning.
Even for you.
And that’s saying a lot, given how outright shitty of a base you’re starting from.
There, you made me feel sorry for you. That’s … some sort of life achievement, I guess. I’ll send you a Certificate of Patheticness, in case you want to frame it for the inevitable video.
SMFH Regards,
MrDibble
If you were twice as clever, you’d still fail to meet minimum expectations half way.
It’s pathetic how desperately you seek approval of complete strangers who have repeatedly shown nothing but contempt for you.
For some, being treated with contempt is better than being ignored.
That would be the definition of troll. And it’s also why a number of us have that troll on ignore.
What’s pathetic is that you think I am seeking your approval. :smack: If I wanted to do that, it would be incredibly easy, and also stultifyingly boring. Of course I would need a new identity (this one’s name is Mudd as far as you lot are concerned – it’s truly bizarre if you actually think I don’t know that). However, creating a new identity is against the rules and therefore I cannot demonstrate how easy. I assure you, though, that toeing the party line and currying favor with the SDMB in-crowd would be child’s play if I had a fresh slate to work with. But I have no interest in playing that game in any case.
I do think that taking him as he claims to be does not make him a Troll, but a guy that constantly **has **to reinvent the democratic party wheel, a very peculiar form of ignorance from one that claims to know the Democratic party ropes. No wonder he acts so surprised when he finds that Democrats already know how to react to concern Trolling from the right, like in the case of the riots.
Heck, he even does not know about how democrats did already that back in 1992 and now, because he acts so surprised about Democrats who are already aware of the political dangers.
You know, even Shagnasty managed to get over his penchant for attention whoring. You might consider looking to your betters.