Lets rewind: I pointed out to kaylasdad about that. Then you came with a post that showed all that you missed the post, as for idioms, there are already 3 in this thread that show that you are clueless about. Followed by:
Again, I never gave the explanation of the pun to you, so it is really you the one that has to explain here. So, that was the first dumb thing you came up with that, the second one is that many others have already explained to you that they understand my English really well.
Others pointed out already that you are pathetic, it is not just because you remain a scientific racist, a defender of climate change deniers and clueless about incels, GMOs, etc. It is also because you ignore how silly is to reinvent political tactics that grandpa Biden was already using and thinking that it was clever to claim that he had listened to you.
Your post #812 shows that you ignored that someone already assisted the other posters with the explanation.
Anyhow, everyone can notice that you avoided citing the rest of the reasons why you are being roasted from my previous post, I take it that those are easier to cite so you cowardly did avoid it.
How about “You are the one showing everyone that you can’t read properly”? That’s hewing as close as possible to GIGO’s sentence structure, but I’d ideally prefer rewording it to something more like “It is you who is demonstrating to everyone your lack of reading comprehension”.
Later in that post:
Lets rewind: I pointed out to kaylasdad about that. Then you came with a post that showed all that you missed the post
This one is tougher because it’s so garbled I’m honestly not completely sure what he’s on about here. But let’s try to parse it and at least create phrasing which, even if it misrepresents his intent, doesn’t assassinate Strunk and White in the process:
“Let’s rewind: I pointed that* out to kaylasdad. Then you posted something** that made it clear to everyone*** that you missed my post”
*What exactly is the antecedent of “that”? Who knows. GIGO does this constantly, and it makes it really hard to follow WTF he is trying to say.
**Still vague. What post is he referring to? Who knows.
***No, it didn’t. But if he is going to utter falsehoods, let’s make them intelligible falsehoods.
GIGO also constantly bludgeons us with a tiresome, stubborn naiveté that cannot simply be explained away by a language barrier. No one but GIGO interpreted my saying I “urged” Biden to denounce violence and looting as meaning I was claiming he and I have private tête-à-têtes. I mean, come ON. When it’s a public figure, simply making the case for doing it in a public forum constitutes “urging” that they do that thing. I tried to explain this to him before, but he is continuing to insist on his risible interpretation.
Nope, I did get it, that was still stupid coming from you. This public forum may be interesting but it is not really important. So yeah, even your urging there was moronic. Unless Biden comes telling others how influential we are that is…
…Anyhow, it does not counter that you did reinvent how the democrats should deal with moronic Republican efforts to tar the democrats when they claim that democrats support the rioters.
I, for one, hope you never stop posting in this thread. I normally don’t like ‘cringe comedy,’ but your expertly misplaced confidence is just a real chef kiss of humorous narcissism.
It is my great hope that you aren’t trolling and that this is actually you, because the comedy only works if you believe everything you’re saying.
Maybe stop posting everywhere else on the board, though.
Wow, GIGO. Sick burn! Got any more of those zingers? You should take this act on the road.
LOL, your self-pwn here is amusing at least. Try checking my commenting history to see how often I post between late Saturday night and Wednesday evening. (This time, actually, I was having so much fun, I pushed it past the usual start time for my weekly “board fast”, a ways into Sunday morning, before I applied some mental discipline and got back on the weekly wagon.)
I don’t give a wet shit what your self-imposed “social media holiday” is, mate. It’s something you choose to do, so factors in to you not exactly making with the lightning ripostes. And don’t pretend you didn’t spend all 3 days off thinking up responses. I bet you even had a Word doc where you practiced them out.
Mmmhmm. Think what you like, but the reality is that yes, what I choose to do is stay off the board for about half the week. Which means I didn’t see any of those comments you imagine I was “thinking up responses” to, until I returned to the board Wednesday evening.
ETA: As for composing and refining responses in a Word doc, that’s pretty funny. I guess you haven’t noticed how often (as with this comment, right now), I go back and furiously edit as much as I can within the five minute deadline? (On Reddit, which lacks such a deadline, I do it over a longer period.) I just fire off responses off the cuff, click “post”, then say “oops, I made a typo” or “wait, I want to word that differently” or “hang on, there’s something else I want to add”. Totally the opposite of what you are imagining!
Well, there is that, and Grammar Nazi is just about the only thing he can aspire for. I can only say that having a life means that sometimes there is no time to edit a post properly, as I had to mind my animae dīmidium meae requests to cuddle and more then.
Think what you like, but the reality is that yes, what I choose to do is stay off the board for about half the week. Which means I didn’t see any of those comments you imagine I was “thinking up responses” to, until I returned to the board Wednesday evening.