I wasn’t intending to be witty, only to highlight how tired and hackneyed your punchline was. Seriously, are you holding up “If you think we hesitate to pick on people with obvious mental problems, how do you explain this thread?” as an example of a clever witty riposte? The structure of that “joke”, if we can even still call it that, is so old and tired the 2,000 year old man would have rolled his eyes at how hacky it is. I mean, c’mon: it’s little more than a slightly dressed-up “I know you are, but what am I?” Borrring.
Irony once again.
Do you feel you have to reflexively post, just to post? I’d advise thinking of something new to say, so’s not to waste everyone’s time.
More irony. The longer your posts are, the more time they waste.
As I’ve said before, you’re not worth more than a potshot.
And you’re not worth more than a 
You said it!
Am I?
I’m not the one bragging about my wit and erudition on the regular. I’m just here to tell you how much you suck, in any and all ways - not to wave my e-peen the way you seem to want to waggle your shriveled one in our faces. I don’t crave the validation of my pitiable “intellect” from people who clearly loathe and pity me, the way way you so obviously, desperately do.
You sad motherfucker.
Ah, Dibble is now playing the humility card. Well, I have to admit: I can’t say as I saw that coming! 
ETA: You do loathe me. You don’t pity me. You pretend to pity me because you loathe me, and that’s the standard schtick (weaksauce though it is) in such a circumstance. Let’s be clear about that.
Very sharp. And it only took you, what, six minutes to figure that out? Tops?
Well, I guess now at least we have an upper bound on how long it might take you to pick out what is obviously implied through social cues and context and restate in your own words as a (generally accurate) conclusion.
Clearly you live in a binary world - not desperately chasing others for validation is not the same thing as humility. “Not needy” is not a synonym for “humble”.
And it’s entirely possible to loathe and pity someone at the same time. And be amused by their rhetorical flailings, too. I loathe you because you’re a racist, misogynist transphobe. I pity you because you’re also clearly mentally challenged in some way - not in any way that would excuse the racism and misogyny and transphobia, mind you. And I laugh at you because your obviously misplaced pride in your average translation skill is funny.
Why would I pretend to pity you? That would only be the case if I were trying to cover up the loathing. But I freely admit to both, so what’s my motivation? Naah, mate, you need to live up to the sad fact that you are truly pathetic, independent of your hatefulness.
Funny, @ASL_v2.0 sneers that my observation about Dibble is trivially obvious; Dibble insists it’s untrue. No one could accuse you two of a coordinated attack!
What? Are you serious with this? Performative pity is a clumsy way to be contemptuous, a feeble attempt to make the object of the alleged pity feel “less than”, since people would generally feel better about being hated and feared (the fear implying power) than being hated and seen as pathetic and pitiable, which acts as a strike against one’s honor. So since this psychological dynamic is so well known, it’s a standard move in online discourse to attempt to leverage it as you did here. But it’s so standard, anyone with a modicum of sophistication can see right through it.
Hard to believe you don’t understand something so basic. But unlike with the fake pity, it’s also hard to see the point of pretending not to understand it. Sometimes you’re just weird. 
“Power”? Ha! Talk about the opposite of humility.
Your complicated hash-pipe scheme only works if you think I loathe and fear you. Has anything anyone’s ever posted in this thread given you the idea that you’re feared by anyone, let alone me?
No, it’s just loathing, or loathing and pity, them’s the choices. How is loathing+pity supposed to make you feel worse than just being loathed? Oh, and laughed at, either way - there’s “power” for you!
Like I give a damn about your “honour” - you’re the guy who constructs elaborate fantasies about 14 yo girls soaping themselves in the shower. I already know you have none to “strike against”.
Put down the Nietzsche, man, you’re worse at philosophy than you are at translation…
For you, it’s a full-time occupation. So I understand the projection.
There, there. I do still pity you.
Again, wrong. 
You are (intentionally?) overcomplicating this. Attempting (very clumsily and unsuccessfully, in this case) to make someone think you “pity” them is nothing more than another way to try to get under their skin, or “get their goat” as my mom would say. It’s slightly more complex than calling them a doodoohead, but only slightly.
Of course you don’t have any concern for my “honour” (or “honor” as I wrote it). Another weird non sequitur.
And this is the second time recently you’ve made this claim about “elaborate fantasies about 14 year old girls soaping themselves in the shower”, without providing evidence. The other time, in a different board, I challenged you for a cite and got “boxed” for doing so. That’s not going to bail you out here.
Yes, yes, “the virtue of prostitutes”, I get it. I got it in the original German, even.
Not everyone is as broken as you, man. That’s why you’re pathetic. I’m not saying I enjoy the feeling of pitying you, but there it is.
And I see the problem you seem to be having - I’m sorry if my previous post has led you to believe I’m telling you I pity you to make you feel better.
I’m sorry if that was your impression. I am telling you I pity you to make you realize you’re a pathetic human being, not to make you happier with your sad little life.
But that doesn’t make the actual feeling of pity “performative”. You really are just that sad a case.
See, it’s stuff like that that make me pity you more. What a sad little non-point you just made.
It’s actually the third time, twice in this thread. The first time I got the age wrong, but I corrected myself.
Do you really fantasize about 14 yo girls lathering up so often that you forget when you post about it? That’s past “pathetic” into “wretched” territory, I’m sad to say.
Still no cite.
Why do you need a cite for your own posts, Slack? Memory still a bit shaky, I see. Well, two years is a long time…
Still no cite. I’m guessing the context might show the post in question is not quite as clear-cut as you describe it, hm? (It’s reminiscent of how, when people try to paint me as a xenophobic bigot, the wording of the “proof” of same cannot, unfortunately from their purposes, be divorced of the context that I welcome immigration from most parts of the world.)
Dibble, it just occurred to me what’s likely behind this driving need to insist you pity me. Years ago now, I described my progressive racial politics (support for international development aid, reparations for slavery, public housing, increased funding of antipoverty social programs, etc.) in terms of a kind of pity for hapless sub-Saharan Africans, who never shook off colonialism and made their own way as South Asians or East Asians did.
This was well before I had any inkling of your own sub-Saharan African heritage (in fact, I assumed that I was talking to a white audience or I might have kept that under wraps), so it’s not possible to charge that I was saying this just to “get your goat”. So now you have made it your zealous mission to flip the script and insist that you are the one who should pity me. Can’t blame you, really. That’s a bitter pill to swallow.
No, he probably pities you for the same reason I do. The notion that internet strangers would be convinced that you’re smart because of a video of a piece of paper with a high test score is just too pathetic to contemplate. It’s hard to fathom that an adult human, of sound mind, could consider that such a silly stunt would be seen as anything other than ridiculous. It is truly pathetic indeed. Pitiable, in fact.
You love pimping that line, Andy. I guess it’s all you’ve got.