I feel awful having to ask this question. A freind of mine is in the hospital for it again. I am happy to go visit him and I am not concerned about catching it myself. On the otherhand, I am a new parent and I would be devastated if my daughter were to get it. On top of this, my wife has had autoimmune issues in the past, so I would not be suprised if she were susceptible.
Just about everything I know about MS comes from wikipedia. It seems like a virus or possibly bacteria could cause it. These things might be contagious. It is apparently more common in people that live further from the equator. It could be a vitamin D thing, but also people spend more time indoors in colder climates where contagions are spread easier.
So basically they don’t know for sure and I should be very cautious for the next sixteen years. I noticed that the wikipedia mentioned HLA abnormalities. I wonder if I should get my daughter tested for the HLA-B27 factor. I’m guessing insurance wouldn’t cover it and if they did it would become a preexisting condition.
From reading the link, I’d say there’s no way to be cautious, beyond basic hygene. The website says flat out that MS is not contagious. It says that there’s probably a trigger and that a virus may be involved.
This sounds like the way people get Shingles, which requires previous contact with the virus that causes Chicken Pox. You can’t catch Shingles from someone else with Shingles. You could possibly catch Chicken Pox, but you could catch that from anyone, even someone who had never had the disease.
In the case of Shingles, it’s known that the patient still carries the virus in their system, and that whenever they have open pustules they can spread Chicken Pox. In the case of MS, this sort of thing is not known to be true.
I’d tend to doubt that the original virus is spread by MS patients. First because it could very well be that the patient gets the virus and becomes immune to the virus, which is then removed from the body. There is no identified virus, so there’s no way to know if it’s retained. Second because MS does not cause pustules and so would not have that avenue of contagion available to it.
If there is a virus associated with MS, it’s one that does not cause an identifiable disease. It could be spread by anyone. Your best bet is to be sure that everyone in your family washes their hands, does not drink out of someone else’s glass, etc.
The article also said that the trigger could be toxins or vitamin deficiencies, so watch for those. All in all, there’s no reason to avoid people with MS. Doing so may give a false sense of security, but that’s about all it will do.
MS is caused by a malfunction in the immune system. There is reason to suspect that an infection can trigger such a malfunction, but this would be an infection by a “common virus”, according to the linked page. That means we are talking about a virus that infects lots of people but only triggers MS in a small percentage of them.
It sounds to me as if avoiding people with MS would have an extremely small effect on one’s risk of developing the disease. It is probably not worth it to worry about this.
That link isn’t working for me, but the quoted text explicitly states that it may be caused by a persistent virus. If they don’t know what causes it, how can they determine that it isn’t contagious?
Yes, a malfunction in the immune system and her mother has had autoimmune issues so check one against my daughter.
Epidemiological studies can determine whether a disease is contagious by looking at whether being in contact with people who have the disease makes you more likely to contract it. I don’t know how extensively MS has been subjected to such studies.
The link is working for me, and it didn’t say a persistent virus, it said a common virus. They, 1) don’t know that it’s a virus that triggers the reaction, 2) if it is a virus, they don’t know which one it is or 3) whether it’s persistent or not. I’m guessing that most viruses are not persistent.
If it’s a common virus, then a person with MS is no more likely to be carrying it than anyone else. If it’s a common virus, it’s everyone else that you need to be worried about.
Seems like a lot of interest, I’m trying to make some sense out of it, but I suck at this today…
MeSH = Multiple Sclerosis + (Epidemiology, Etiology, Viral, Etc.) = TMI, way TMI
In other words, it’s very well studied, and I’m too tired today to make sense of it.
But all of the reputable info summaries that I see says pretty much this:
I know an anicdote is not data, but myself, my father, my mother, and 5 members of the neighbor’s family activly helped care for a neighbor lady who had MS, over a period of not just years, but decades. If her MS was contagious, one of us would have gotten it. We haven’t.
Well as some of you know, I have it. Luckily, it isn’t as debilitating for me as it is for some people. (I’ve been working a full-time job for 25 years.)
But be that as it may (and I doubt if it ever was :D), as far as I know, I never spent any time around a person with it so I know I didn’t “catch” it. None of my family, friends or relatives has contracted the disease so I feel safe that I’m not spreading it around.
Just out of curiosity, does having MS prevent a person from donating blood? Actually, I’m not planning too because MS produces a lot of fatigue and a blood donation would probably boost my fatigue quotient several hundred per cent.
Okay, not the most technically accurate medical treatise on the subject but that has been my experience with it.
A friend of mine and his wife both have MS. He had already been diagnosed when they met. She wasn’t diagnosed until after they had been married for awhile. It has always interested me in the “what are the odds of that happening outside of people meeting in an MS support group or something?” kind of way.
I have had MS for about 35 years, maybe 40. The number of people whom I have known well (and lived with - including my son) that have caught it from me is zero. I have never been told by any medical professional that there was any chance of contagion.
Wolf meister - they won;t take our blood, at least in Canada simply because nobody knows for certain that there are no risks and they don’t really want to find out the hard way, y’know?
IANAD, WAG etc. But I have several autoimmune diseases and several more in my family. As far as I understand, autoimmune diseases are not contagious since there isn’t a particular virus or bacteria involved. It’s the body fighting itself. So, MS is just about as contagious as my dad’s diabetes, my mom’s arthritis or my hypothyroidism and asthma.
Edit: I don’t have a cite, but people have been providing very good cites earlier on in the thread and general opinion seems to lean the same way. (Caveat inserted for morning stupidity)
No it wouldn’t be a preexisting condition. There’s clear evidence that genetics play a factor in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and most if not all cancers, but saying that “you have a gene linked to illness X” is the same as “you are sick with X” is such a jump of logic it should be proposed for the Guinness Book of Records.
Many years ago there was a “epidemic” of new cases of MS in an a isolated locale (an island community, maybe?). The interesting thing was that the area suffered an epidemic of canine distemper some time prior to the new cases of MS being seen.