Do you know who Beyoncé is married to?

Bebe Rebozo used to be in the news a lot, back in the day.

(I posted that just so I could get to say Bebe Rebozo again.:D)

Wow is this board showing it’s old age. It was a simple question.

If there were Internet message boards back in 1973, I would hope the reaction would be less hostile to the question of say, who is Diana Ross married to?

But the I remember my Grandfather back then. Who is she? What do I care?

I guess nothing changes.

Don’t know who Diana Ross was married to, either, and I was in high school in 1973. I listened to her music, but didn’t (and still don’t) give a flip about her personal life.

An artist should be evaluated on their art. To do otherwise is to sink to the lowest levels of prejudice and nosiness.

Hey, I was 22 in 1973, and I doubt I knew then who Diana Ross was married to. And I probably didn’t know who many other music celebrities were married to, aside from John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

Are you even reading what you are responding to? Both Jay-Z and Beyonce are considerably more popular with people closer to their age. Regardless, you are completely missing the point once again. I am not trying to dictate what others should like or spend their money on. I am saying one should at least know who both of those figures are. As in, one should be aware of who they are, what they do, and the cultural impact they have made. Clearly, you know these things. Why you seem to still be desirous to take offense to a comment not directed at you is beyond me.

I never said it was. In fact, I have repeatedly and explicitly said it wasn’t.

Entertainers do change the world. I don’t plan on writing out some essay about how Jay-Z has impacted music, clothing, culture, etc. So if you don’t feel like looking for yourself, or trusting people at Time magazine (who named him one of the most influential people), then there is not much I can do for you.

Geez. How hard is this to understand? Nobody is forcing or suggesting you have to like something. I am arguing that a bare minimum of cultural literacy is to be expected from otherwise educated and competent people.

It’s not conformity; it’s having a common basis of understanding.

This is debatable. But even if I grant your assertion, context matters. There is a reason I said willfully ignorant. Furthermore, I think it was clear I was not using the term to be deliberate pejorative given that I said:

[QUOTE=Me]
It’s one thing to be ignorant. I am sure there a plenty of Asian stars I have never heard of for example. However, it’s entirely another matter to actively avoid news presented to you on a regular bass, AND feel no urge to find out more about it just for your own edification.
[/QUOTE]

Once again, you are misrepresenting what has been said. I do not think knowing who is married to whom is particularly valuable.

It’s distinction is meaningful because it highlights the motivations of those people.

Lol, great unwashed? I think I’ll stand by original statements about elitism and entitlement in this case.

Thanks for proving my point.

That your opinion on what is worthy of being known is worthless?

My pleasure.

Pretty weak and uninspired retort from someone with the balls to call people domestic animals.

I’m not sure what you’re “so”-ing here. If you’re aware that Beyonce is a pop singer then you know all I’d expect someone to know about her. I have no special interest in Beyonce, she’s just so widely known that I’d expect other people to have heard of her.

Not knowing about one pop star is not participating in society? :confused:

Don’t worry, there’s no risk of that.

Sure, we have much greater access to information, but that access comes with a much greater inundation of information. There’s far too much stuff floating around out there, we all have to engage filters if we want to function. Some of those filters include deciding certain genre’s are not worth our personal attention, and not bothering to pay attention or absorb things about those genres. Sure, if there’s something that wanders into our focus, we can look it up to get a basic understanding of who the person is. But what constitutes wandering into our focus, being of enough interest to go look that person up?

Honestly, I have not seen Jay-Z in the news. Maybe my filters are especially high. I don’t go look at yahoo or such for news. I don’t read Time. I heard it mentioned that Beyonce is pregnant, but didn’t hear or at least absorb mention of Jay-Z’s name in that context. I did not hear about them going to Cuba. I did hear about Dennis Rodman going to North Korea and I think Cuba.

What did I miss out on? The relevance of a comment in an SD thread where someone was watching an SNL skit with Beyonce and someone commented “Jay-Z won’t be happy”?

Maybe I am being willfully ignorant to, in the face of this thread and all the information presented about how “influential and important” Jay-Z is, still think I don’t care. Maybe I’m just being obstinate because of the tone of the conversation, and in another context being told the things about him mentioned in this thread would spark a desire to at least see why others find him influential.

But I can honestly say before this thread he was a nobody to me, someone that I probably had heard was married to Beyonce but did not actively remember that about him, and couldn’t put a song name or lyric to and had no idea about his involvement in sports. None of that registered to me, it is meaningless and unimportant to me.

But hearing he wrote the song “99 Problems” does not impress me about him. One more reason to not be interested in him.

Wait, so is Jay-Z the person to blame for a generation of guys who don’t know how to wear pants?