I’ve been semi-monthly (15th and 30th) for years, then company switched to bi-weekly (every other Friday) in 2026.
I dislike it although I’m in the minority among my coworkers. Yes I make the same per year, but the reality is I bring home less per month 10 months out of the year. There a 2 months where it now means 3 paychecks.
Also, semi monthly made things like auto pay or budgeting in general easier knowing the exact pay date would not change month to month.
I’ve worked with both kinds of pay structures, at my current job (where I’ve been for over a decade) it is semi-monthly. (Paid on the 10th and 25th of each month.)
I like it because it’s very predictable. I always know when my paychecks are coming every month. It makes it easy to budget and do autopayments, as stated in the OP.
It wouldn’t be the end of the world if I did every other week like I’ve had at other employers, but it’s so much better this way.
When I was working, my company switched at some point the other way, from bi-weekly to semi-monthly. I was happier with that change.
Now that I’m retired, of course, everything is monthly, but different income sources pay at different times during the month. Especially Social Security comes right in the middle of the month, which is generally very welcome. Pension comes at the end of the month, and IRA distribution comes somewhere in between.
Or it means you’ve noticed you can sweat the pennies and timing to the last possible day, or you can keep an adequate cushion, pay bills as needed, and earn a whopping $5 per year less on your assets. For me, spending $5 per year to not worry about that shit seems kinda obvious.
Yeah, likewise. I keep enough of a cushion that I don’t have to worry about precise details. It’s not like interest on savings accounts amounts to much.
One of my early jobs was paid fortnightly, in cash.
My living expenses and rent were paid weekly and fortnightly, in cash, so it would have made budgeting easier if I had needed to budget, which I didn’t particularly at that time.
To me, it has never made a big difference, and I have no preference. I’ve worked at places which did every two weeks, and ones which did semi-monthly (usually the 15th and the final day of the month).
At my first “real” job, we got paid weekly (every Friday). This was at a large (Fortune 500-level) company, in the late '80s/early '90s, which was still controlled by the founding family; even though doing payroll every week was not an insignificant expense, they kept doing it, in recognition that most of their employees were blue-collar workers in their manufacturing plant and distribution center, who appreciated it.
Hmmm… most jobs I’ve held actually paid monthly. Is that an unusual practice? And now, in retirement, pension payments are monthly. I don’t see why monthly payments should be any kind of hardship since the amount you get is exactly the same. It also meshes well with the fact that most bills are due on a monthly basis.
When I was in grad school at the University of Wisconsin, and had a graduate assistantship, they paid me monthly. I think that may have been the norm for the UW: my father was a professor with the UW Extension, and I remember him mentioning that he, too, was paid monthly.
As a retiree I’m currently monthly (though in two parts - large pension payment from my former employer and tiny tax-free medical reimbursement payment from a sub-contractor agency, usually a couple days separated). Which is…fine. I keep a sizeable buffer in my checking account so it I never have to balance that carefully month to month, just watch general trends.
But my entire ~35 year full-time career was bi-weekly. This includes a couple of 27-check years, which often seemed to catch payroll by surprise (they happen about every dozen years, so institutional knowledge would often lapse), causing a mini-budget crisis. Since I was an hourly worker that entire period with multiple reporting time codes every day for different tasks, I suppose it might theoretically have made it easier to calculate overtime and whatnot of which there was often at least a little bit. Never bothered me because I’ve never experienced anything else and after a few years I was rarely/almost never living paycheck to paycheck.
Ha! That reminds me of when I was working for a small tech company, which I believe paid bi-weekly, but the main point here is that back in the day, they paid by physical paper cheques that you had to take to the bank.
There was a short period of time back then when I was playing the stock market, and coincidentally having particularly good success for a while. I was getting enough windfalls that for a while I didn’t bother taking my pay cheques to the bank. I was amused that this laxness on my part doubly infuriated the cranky old lady in the accounting department, both because it screwed up her bookkeeping and because she resented this youthful Mr Moneybags who didn’t even need his pay cheques (very far from the truth, but I found how much it irritated her to be amusing!)
I must have missed those. I would have had a lot to say about Austria’s legally mandated system, in which one’s annual salary is paid out over 14 “months”.