So, I’ve decided to finally upgrade the rest of the house to LED, now that there are the $2.50 Phillips bulbs as well as inexpensive high CRI bulbs that are supposed to solve any spectral problems. (I plan to use a mix, the phillips will go into multi-bulb fixtures as well as a high CRI bulb or 2, as well as outdoor and garage lights I rarely use)
So, these new bulbs eat around 8-13 watts, depending on the bulb and the type. Occupancy sensors also eat power to run their motion detector. So if it eats half a watt all the time, and this saves me from a certain amount of hours per day of eating 8 watts, it doesn’t sound like I get ahead by much.
Maybe I could wire the switch in the kitchen, living room, etc as an occupancy sensor and the switch in rarely used rooms as a vacancy sensor? (so it doesn’t consume power running the motion detector once off, I hope?)
I guess from another perspective, once you have LEDs, occupancy sensors are probably a waste of money. The sensors are about $17 each on Amazon for the brand with good reviews. If the sensor saves you 12 hours a day for a 4 bulb circuit that consumes a total of 48 watts, then it saves me…$23 a year. Wow. Still worth it. Even if the thing *does *have idle power draw, it’s worth it.
And while the sensor costs money and has idle power draw, it also costs money every time you forget to turn a light off, or if you trip over something because a room is too dark…