NM
I have yet to read a post by you that doesn’t make me want to marry you and have a passel of little dopelings. Keep on keeping on.
Bring back the Girl Next Door look, I say.
I don’t know. GIS doesn’t turn up anything where she’s not fully made-up.
Appearing in a Carl’s Hardees Jr ad is a total turn off, but she’s not unattractive.
I don’t know if pretty is the exact descriptor I would use, though.
She is attractive, not my favorite but that is not due to any feature. But she is attractive.
Not really. I’m attracted to less put together people. Part of it, of course, is that she looks like the type of person who would never look my way. Someone being attracted to me can be a very attractive trait on its own. Still, most of the women who have personally floated my boat own no or very little makeup.
She appears to have had her nose broken at some point, which seems to have spaced her philtrum a bit wider that might be expected, but I think she’s still very good looking.
I think she would be more appealing if she were styled a bit more naturally.
For those calling too much silicone, I got the impression part of her claim to fame is that she’s all natural, thus the tie in with the All Natural Burgers she was flogging. Am I misinformed?
Anyway not sure I would use the word “pretty” just because of the little peculiarity mentioned above. Still captivating or beautiful. Or something.
A quick Google search turned her up on a list of the “Sixty Best Natural Breasts of 2013 For Breast Cancer Awareness”. For however authoritative that is.
I think that she is very pretty!
No objection.
OMG she’s hideous! I threw up all over my keyboard when I looked at the picture of her. Why didn’t you warn me, OP?
FTR, I find Emily Blunt plain to, but still sexy.
What? In my original post I called her hot with a great body! Where are you getting that I’m surprised that we don’t all agree on these sorts of things?
My comments were only about her from the neck up. I think something about her face in the nose/philtrum/upper lip seems off and was curious if anyone noticed it, and what they thought. To me it’s distracting because I think it makes her face look plastic-ish. I don’t think she’s hideous by any means.
Of course. Maybe not in the same class of a Kate Upton or a Miranda Kerr face-wise, but I’m not astonished that she’s a successful supermodel or anything.
It’s one of those things where you sort of expect perfection, because she’s a successful model, and when you don’t get it you are fixated on it.
For me, it’s Kate Upton’s hips. They’re completely wrong in proportion to her waist, and any time I see her picture for anything, I think about it. It’s sort of a bummer, really.
I’m seeing a young Lee Marvin.
I don’t think a nose job would generally leave one with a huge philtrum, crooked nose, and broad septum.
Multi-point lighting and/or Photoshop, however, might. (Well, “highlight in an unflattering way,” in the former case, and “stretch out a bit much” in the latter.)
Seriously, the way she’s lit kind of gave her a bit of extra glare on her nose. In the other shot, she’s not lit the same way and wearing matte (I think; I’m a photog, not a makeup artist) makeup. She looks pretty there.
I’ve seen girls that have a nose that is off from an otherwise beautiful face, but she doesn’t seem to fit. In fact, it makes her less attractive, as I find the slight flaws enhance a bit. There’s something unreal about being too perfect, making me connect them with a doll instead of a real person.