I’ve been thinking about temperature in regards to cooking more than usual lately, mostly because I’ve been doing a decent amount of sous vide cooking and I just got a thermo pop thermometer. I seriously love that thing.
I happened to be at a trivia night at a bar a while ago and they asked about the minimum safe temp for steak. I guessed either 140 or 145 and we had to be within 10 degrees. The guy said the temp was 160. For ground meats yes, but not so for whole steaks. He quoted the USDA site and clearly read the wrong part.
The next time I cooked chicken using a sous vide recipe, the temp seemed low to me after having seen the USDA chart. After some research I found that the temp, depending on meat type, if held long enough can indeed be safe.
The minimum cooking temps, much like expiration dates are weighted on the safe side of things, as they should be. Protecting people from harm is the whole purpose of this. Are the people that are potentially being saved by these guidelines actually utilizing thermometers?
I could be very wrong, but I would think that thermometer usage would be higher in homes where it is being used as more of a tool to “perfect” the food’s temp, rather than make sure it’s just safe to eat. I’m thinking of temping a large roast, Chateaubriand, filet mignon, sous vide meats and other really temperature sensitive meats. When cooking a pork chop or burger or chicken breast, doneness might be judged more often by sight. Why use a thermometer when you can clearly see it’s fully cooked?
So, do you use an internal thermometer? If so, how and when? If you think they’re not needed please explain.