Does anyone else dislike "cromulent"?

And yet I have always felt “copacetic” (meaning, very good / excellent / completely satisfactory) to be a rather elegant and inspired word-coining (not that I actually use it much); whereas “cromulent” – like “copacetic” for you – makes me want to “go postal” on its users. Conclusion, maybe: we’re strange creatures, and our instinctive likes and dislikes don’t make sense and are not consistent – they’ve no need to do or be so, they just are.

All kinds of strange-and-marvellous derivations suggested, for “copacetic” – www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-cop1.htm

Whilst bugs me too. It seems that mostly UKers tend to use it a lot in places where normal Americans would just say "while. Why that makes it annoying, I dunno, they use lots of silly words, but it does.

Believe it or not, we think the same about you people. Strange, that…

I’m American and I’ve always used a lot of “British” words. Like spilt and spelt (vs spilled and spelled) as well as whilst and amongst. In fact, just the other week I looked up when to use “among” vs “amongst” because I didn’t know the difference and found out they are the same.

It’s like adopting the spelling of the word “duh” as “doh”. Equally “off-putting”.

Duh and doh are two different words. Duh is an implication that something should have been obvious, duh. Doh is an annoyed grunt.

Also, there’s often a ’ in d’oh!