To be honest, I’ve never heard anyone use “Saudi” that way. Maybe I don’t read as much news as I think I do. If I read the headline you cited as your example, I would have assumed they meant a single Saudi person who made that criticism, not the country as a whole.
I used to notice it a lot with Gulf War I vets and military people, but I still run across it. On the topic of the headline, I did look in to the article and it doesn’t seem to refer to a specific person.
There isn’t a helluva lot of difference between Saudia Arabia and the Saudi royal family, so “the Saudis” is probably accurate in most usages. I’ve never heard anyone call the country just “Saudi,” though. Sounds like returning soldier shorthand.
My uncle fled the U.S. to work in Saudi Arabia for a while. When he got back, he wrote a book called “It’s Saudi Duty Time” (unpublished so far). That was in the 80’s and the usage was common enough even then. I never thought there was anything wrong with it nor did it occur to me that there might be.
I think I’ve only ever heard one person use it, and he was a Gulf War I vet. It grated on me slightly, but I think that was because that guy was a bonehead and many things he did grated on me.
In that case it strikes me as a perfectly acceptable usage. There are plenty of ethnic Arabs who don’t live in Saudi Arabia. Calling citizens of that country Saudis seems a reasonable locution. Nay, a wise one.
I guess we can change the name of it to “Intolerant Arabia”, then we’d just be able to refer to it as “Intolerant” and everybody would know where we were referring to.
It’s a headline. Headlines abbreviate thing. “Saudi Arabia” takes up far too much space. As does “Saudi Government.” It’s like Twitter, only fewer characters.
I lived there for a while as a kid in the 1960s. Dad was former USAF, and everyone called the county Saudi, not Saudi Arabia. We also referred to the US as the States.