Again, I have hardly advanced any arguments of my own in this thread, but simply restated the current state of the debate in as much as I am aware of it, which is that the overwhelming majority of theistic and atheistic thinkers alike accept the soundness of Plantinga’s defense. The argument is clearly logically valid, and to date, nobody to the best of my knowledge has found a credible refutation of its premises. What has been developed are additional theses that one might like to hold that are in conflict with both the simultaneous existence of evil and of a tri-omni God, but of course, that isn’t really an invalidation of the argument, since it doesn’t touch the conclusion that tri-omnihood and the existence of evil are compatible.
Is it possible that all those thinkers are wrong, and you are right? Of course. It is also possible that all other vehicles are going the wrong way when they are coming towards you, and you’re driving in the right direction. It isn’t how anybody should rationally bet, however.
Well, then show where the argument as I’ve laid it out above goes wrong, rather than just flatly asserting that it does. As it is, this is just empty bluster.