Forgive the inept title. I don’t know what to call it, but some celebrity will be asked by the media, “Are you a feminist?” Or some celeb will spontaneously declare that s/he is or is not a feminist. Then you have a shitstorm in the MSM and social media about what s/he did or didn’t say s/he was.
There’s a guy whose channel I watch on YouTube. It’s not about politics, usually, but he took the time to make a long video emphatically stating that, while he believes in sexual equality, he’s not a feminist. So the non-famous are getting into the act too. This all is in addition to the trove of online content that is actually about feminism.
I think it’s all pretty odd for one main reason: There’s no official Feminist Manifesto with which to agree or disagree. So if you say you are one, what does that really mean? And if you say you aren’t one, what are you rejecting?
I think the trick bag some people get into with this works like this. The standpoint of the questioner is that of seeing feminism in terms of its noble goals: sexual equality, equal pay for equal work, treating women like human beings, and so on. The standpoint of anyone who says no, however, is that of seeing feminism (perhaps unconsciously) as a tainted brand, one irreparably damaged by its negative and sometimes explicitly misandrist adherents (do not take this to mean I think any particular proportion of self-described feminists falls in this category).
Thus, questioner and answerer are talking at cross-purposes, and everyone misunderstands each other.
How about this as an answer? This is what I sincerely believe, and I think it could work:
I am a feminist insofar as “feminism” means supporting the equality of the sexes and the ideal relationship between men and women collectively in society.
How can anyone object to that? Because, again, there’s no manifesto. If someone were dissatisfied with that answer, s/he would have to indicate what additional beliefs the answerer needs to sign onto.
Those are my thoughts on this. What do you think?