And even if it had- so trump is convicted of a felony. he already was convicted of 34 of them, iirc. And there were shirts and signs “I am voting for the Felon”. Does anyone think 35 felonies would be the tipping point? "Oh that’s it- 34 felonies- that’s no problem, but 35! Nope, not voting for him!.
I even asked this question in
My final post-
“Sure, all those are fine, but the real issue is the question I have asked and received no answer- Again I ask 'what “protection” could the DoJ do to keep trump from running?”
And it killed the thread. The Garland haters couldnt come up with a reply.
But not much happened to them, Sure they were fired, but (for example) Strzok sued and got $1.2Million, not to mention a juicy book deal and a professorship.
You wouldnt. That’s not news. But I was on one, and remember the evidence is one sided.
A Lafourche Parish cold case murder remains unsolved this week after a grand jury failed to indict a pair of suspects who were previously arrested in the case.
and here
and here
There has to be evidence enough to indict- not convict. Lower standard.
