Obviously, I disagree.
The refusal to admit that ACORN committed even the slightest illegal act is the position that is void of honesty, intellectual or otherwise. My position is that they did, and further that their punishment for whatever minor offenses they committed was completely disproportionate to those offenses.
YOUR position seems to be in lock-step with Diogenes: no, no, no, ACORN cannot and would not do anything even slightly wrong.
I am confident that the vast majority of people reading our respective positions would conclude that I’m on much more solid ground here.