Depends. He plucks the middle part of his mono brow, now. And he wears the foolproof socks and shirts/ jacket combo’s I bought him. And he wears belts, and let’s me hem trousers so he doesn’t walk around with frayed back edges of his jeans.
Each of these changes cost me years of nagging.
It’s not worth it, and frankly it has cost me a lot of love that I had to nag so hard for these things.
I’m a man who, when my wife and I met 16 years ago was very different than I am now. To some extent I was changing when I met her which is what brought us together in the first place. To some extent her influences after we came together changed me but I would like to believe, and truly do believe that we have both changed each other in many ways. Hopefully for the better.
She will tell you that she would not have married me had I not already begun changing by the time we got to that discussion but again I would say the same about her. We had four years together (two living together) before we began discussing marriage. I think it is important that two people grow together first before committing to marriage if they truly intend to stay together.
One point to stress is what you are expecting to change. Things that are fundamental to that persons personality probably can’t be changed. If for instance I had wanted to change the fact that my wife spent so much time painting then I feel that would be a fail. Conversely if her intent was to make me stop building stuff that again would be a fail. This in my opinion only goes to support my assertion that you need to grow together first, then commit to a lifelong adventure.
Lastly lets put the fine point on this. Much of the implication on this topic is about a habitual failure prior to and during the initial relationship. Those things are probably not going to be things anyone can change other than the person themselves. A cheater is a cheater until he or she decides to not be. Same goes for the habitually unemployed, deadbeat parents and all the other things we would like to change about someone but are very likely to be powerless to do so. Unless that person actually decides to do so completely on their own all we could do to influence it is support them when they are changing and walk away when they choose not to. Sadly I have been in that exact place and had to painfully walk away.
I’d like to add that, IMHO, some men and women go into marriage hoping to change their spouses, and their spouse does indeed change, but they then the change-initiators realize they don’t *like/want *that change after all.
I once trained a stubborn bull necked 110 lb German Shepherd using a correction collar, a leash, treats and a well organized behavior modification program.
If you let me add electric shock, I think I could train a man.
Or the other old joke about marriage and change: the bride and groom as happy as can be on their honeymoon.
The groom thinking: I just got the best blowjob of my life.
The bride thinking: I just gave the last blowjob of my life.
People do change, and for the better. It happens all the time. But… real change only comes from within. You cannot force someone else to turn into what you’d prefer them to be. That never happens.
I have no idea why “I’ll make him change” is such an idée fixe with women, but it really is.
This is often repeated nonsense. Coca-Cola would not be spending millions of dollars in advertising if change only came from within. People can be influenced, manipulated, and changed into different people.
The problem of changing someone in a relationship is that normal people are not professional advertising executives. They are not trained to influence behavior. However, they believe they can change their new spouse. Or they believe that marriage or - much worse - a new child will change their new spouse.
This horrible delusional thinking comes mostly from pop-culture media. It comes from movies like Beauty and the Beast, that teach girls that if you love an angry and abusive man that he will change just because you love him. It also comes from a lack of examples of realistic long term marriages in pop-culture. We constantly see stories of the beginnings of a relationship. Nothing is ever said about what happens ten years into a relationship.
The result is that we are good at starting amazing relationships but not holding on to them. The rising divorce rate reflects that. This idea that many people have that marriage can change someone just shows that many people have a severe lack of knowledge about long term relationships.
People can be changed. But changing people is hard, and often a full-time profession. It’s not a burden that you want to have in a relationship. People do not fail to change others because “change comes from within.” They fail because they believe that changing someone would be as easy as it looks in the movies.
I don’t think that’s what Coca-Cola is doing. They (and the advertising industry as a whole) seem to feel pretty strongly that once people have decided they’re Coke or Pepsi people, getting them to change is impossible. The advertising is targeting the next generation of undecided buyers and trying to get existing customers to drink more.
I agree that people can change but it really does have to come from the person. A friend of mine set her sights on a guy who is one of the slimiest people I know. We’d known him for years and seen him bully his wife and kids, cheat on her constantly, and just in general be a douchebag. After the divorce, she was sure she could fix all that. At the time, I told her he seemed more interested in a girl about 15 years younger than him at his office. She scoffed, saying he was into her (she’s long had a problem telling the difference between someone that likes her and someone that wants to screw her). He slept with my friend, treated her like crap, told anyone that would listen everything they did and dumped her.
He then began pursuing the 20-something he really liked. Though I couldn’t see the appeal for her, she did indeed start a relationship with him and while he’s still a jerk, he cleaned up his act. It wasn’t that she asked him to change or hoped he’d change, or planned to change him - she just made it clear the womanizing jerk he was didn’t stand a chance and he took the initiative. They’ve been together 15 years now.
*At Wanamaker’s and Saks and Klein’s
A lesson I’ve been taught
You can’t get alterations on a dress you haven’t bought
At any vegetable market from Borneo to Nome
You mustn’t squeeze a melon till you get the melon home
Marry the man today
Give him the girlish laughter
Give him your hand today
And save the fist for after
Carefully expose him to domestic life
And if he ever tries to stray from you
Have a pot roast
Have a headache
Have a baby …have two!*
(Really, folks? It took 39 posts to get this in? )
I think you are making a meaningless distinction here. The decision to pick up and drink a can of Coca-Cola will always come from inside the person. It cannot work any other way unless I have telekinetic powers or shove a can of Cola down his throat. If you define change this way, by tracking where it physically comes from, then you’ll be right to say that no one can change anyone.
But defining change this way ignores how much outside influence there is on people’s behavior. I do not think it matters where we decide change ultimately comes from. Whether it’s from the Coke ad or from the person drinking the soda. What matters is what influences the change. And it’s pretty clear that without Coke ads, a whole lot less people would be drinking coke.
That’s what someone who wants a spouse to change wants to know. She does not care about the distinction between her changing her spouse or her behavior ultimately causing the spouse to change from within. All that matters is if there is something she can do that might lead to change.