Well sometimes the sceptics need a sort of sounding logical explanation to actually try it and find out yes it does seem to work, then they may research it and find out what you said about it being unsupportable, however they can not place it in nonsense as it does seem to work, then they begin to question why. After which some are no longer in your camp.
It works, you may not like it, but let it be what it is regardless.
I just brought up a picture of Scarlett Johansson on my computer. While looking at the picture, I asked her questions, and then gave either a thumbs-up (meaning yes), or a thumbs-down (meaning no). Amazingly, when I then looked at my thumb, the answers to the questions were all, so far as I could tell, correct, 100% of them.
What I did is exactly the same thing as what you did, except that your questions probably didn’t lead to the answers that a hot movie star thinks you’re a stud and wants to go out with you. Therefore, my version of dowsing is superior.
‘Camp Straight Dope’?
Would it be OK with you if I refer to this and credit you on future posts as to how some (including you) feel about the members of this message board?