True. You need that inflammatory response to kickstart the adaptive immune system. That’s the reason for adding adjuvants to vaccines after all.
I can’t remember if the mRNA vaccines have added adjuvants and I can’t find anything in the literature at the moment. It’s possible that the lipid nanoparticles or even the mRNA can stimulate the innate immune response. Certainly people have side effects that suggest this.
But temporary inflammation doesn’t cause.
That is exactly what I’ve read: that, due to the nanoparticles and the mRNA itself, they found they didn’t actually have to use additional adjuvants.
I actually wonder how that might affect other uses, where an immune response would be an unfortunate side effect rather than a desired one.
The fact that he’s pitching a gibberish argument at a mainstream public audience, rather than making a technical argument to specialists who will understand it, is pretty much everything you need to know.
Doesn’t cause what? Incomplete sentences? Invisible words?
(I assume you left out “cancer”)
Ssshhhhh. They’re listening…
Just wanted to thank the house for helping to think through Malone’s claims. It’s discouraging that thanks to people like him, the pandemic is ending up that much harder to overcome.
I’ve read that they do not. I was pleased with that, because I feel like vaccines with adjuvants sometimes trigger my allergies. Which this one didn’t.