I would only like to ask, (very nicely), why was my thread closed? If it was the fear of my doing this, I think that in my OP, it had already been established about twice, that I would NOT do this, since I was anticipating this kind of response.
My apologies if I have annoyed you with this (or the original) thread, I never intended to.
That looks like what Manhattan used to call an “asked and answered” question. Enough people had chimed in saying that your actions were not justified, and on top of that the moderator may have just felt uncomfortable about this type of hypothetical question floating around in GQ. The thread kind of looks like you’re fishing for some smartass to come along and tell you that your behaviour would be justified. Next thing you know, you’re at the Homoe Depot buying duct tape and a staple gun.
If you’re only asking for clarification as to why your thread was closed, and not actually complaining about the closure – why not just email DrMatrix and discuss this that way, Topaz?
Ice Wolf, I’ve seen similar questions to yours asked about other threads and I have a theory: Since the thread closing was publicly posted, an explanation that’s publicly seen is asked for.
Yeah, could be, NoClueBoy. I just thought that, rather than put up a thread over here, like waving an arm in the air and yoo-hooing DrMatrix on the off-chance he sees this, wouldn’t an email have been more direct?
Unless Topazdid intend for this to be a public statement anyway …
I bet it’s got something to do with the fact that SDMB operates at a loss and they don’t want to get messed up in legal disputes. You may have said that you weren’t going to do it and that it was purely hypothetical, but if some troll popped in and said that you would be justified, some lurker could take that as truth and do it. They could later say they saw it on SDMB and thought it was legal. Then we all lose.
That’s pretty much why I closed it. You were asking if illegal actions would be justified. The answer to “Are you legally justified?” (No) was already given. Anything more would be opinions and treading on possibly advocating illegal actions.
Your thread did have an interesting element. It’s the first time I’ve ever seen the “giving someone the finger” emoticon reply. I didn’t realize it was possible to do this.