It was an attempt to redirect the thread back to the OP.
Well of course you don’t know what categories he falls under because all we know is that he has a birth certificate. As proved with a $200k lawsuit over McDonald’s coffee in a ladies crotch, anything can be done with good litigation.
Oh, but that’s a generalization. I’m sure you’ll nitnoid that to death too. :rolleyes:
I still don’t get it. Can you explain it? You said “you do not automatically lose your US Citizenship by being born to US Citizens overseas”. I really must be missing something. How can you “lose” your citizenship by being born overseas? The worst that could happen is that you did not acquire it but it would be impossible to lose it. Did anybody say such thing? It is not a question asked in the OP at all. He has no doubt of his American citizenship. What am I missing? I still don’t get it.
[quote]
Well of course you don’t know what categories he falls under because all we know is that he has a birth certificate.
[quote]
We know a bit more than that and we have no reason to believe he falls under any of the categories. Saying you can just go and litigate without any merit is just silly.
I am sure that is plenty relevant to a judge in Spain: “Your honor, I am entitkled to Spanish citizenship because a lady in America got $200K for spilling coffee over her crotch”. :rolleyes:
We deal with factual answers here and yours are begging to be nitpicked. Either the OP fulfils the requirements or he doesn’t. Saying “get a good lawyer” is not a factual answer and is not much help. Providing the factual information about who is entitled to Spanish citizenship and how is what I did and what I consider the factual answer to the factual question.
So as well as being obnoxious, you’re also calling me a liar. You’ve yet to provide me with proof positive that I’m wrong on the issue of right of abode creating a right to PRC citizenship. Your hectoring is tiresome.
Still, you raised doubts in my mind, so I checked French citizenship:
It is true that Germany has recently (as was pointed out) modified its nationality law. However, I should also point out that I’ve heard that many EU countries have tightened their requirements, which can already be gleaned from the quotes in this thread.
It is hardly ever the case that the mere fact of being born in the country makes you a national citizen, or even gives you the option of becoming a citizen. There are mostly additional requirements, such as
residence for a number of years,
legal residence (as opposed to being in the country illegally).
Furthermore, as the last quote shows, there often is a limited time window in which you can apply.
Getting back to the OP, this means that it is not prima facie clear whether he can apply for Spanish citizenship. Given the paucity of facts he supplied there is no way to ascertain that properly.
No, every single cite proves I was right and not one of those countries grants citizenship by the mere act of being born on their soil. Not a single one. And everybody else in this thread understands that except you. I am tired of this ridiculous exchange. If you want to continue we can do it in the pit where I can explain things to you more clearly. Just let me know if you are interested in my offer.
Not France. At least not anymore, since the immigration and citizenship laws have been stiffened a dozen years ago. AFAIK, if you were born in France you must also now have lived here for a given number of years (I can’t remember how many) and request the french citizenship (and you can only do so for some years after your 18th birthday) instead of it being granted automatically.
Supposedly that has been enacted in order to limit the number of mothers who used to enter France ilegally or legally and give birth to their child on french soil, so that the child would have the french citizenship and the parents a recidency permit.
Anyone born in Ireland - north or south - can claim Irish citizenship (cite). It’s a controversial policy and its opponents frequently claim that it is unique in western Europe. I’m not about to go looking up all the other countries’ laws, but I’ve never seen that claim challenged.
The person that you were disputing specifically said EU. You asked for evidence about Switzerland even though they never claimed any knowledge about countries outside of the EU, except for Norway.
No, we were talking about the entire whole wide world:
So it turns out we were talking about the world and not about any specific country or about the EU. He said with “most European countries” which I would say includes Switzerland. He was wrong. And so are you. Just read the thread.